Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-21-1997 - 11a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 10-21-1997
>
Agenda - 10-21-1997 - 11a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2013 9:04:49 AM
Creation date
8/15/2013 9:04:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
11a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19971021
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FROM D HUNTERiP DORR PHONE NO. 9199670683 Jun. 06 1997 08:19AM POI <br /> 32 <br /> TO: OWASA Board of Directors <br /> FROM: Dolly Hunter <br /> DATE: June 5, 1997 <br /> SUBJECT: Recommendation for Protecting Cane Meek Water Supply <br /> 1. In order for clustering to be achievable in rural Orange County,it requires a maximum <br /> of 20%open space with a minimum lot size of 1 acre.Land is the greatest expense in <br /> rural developments while infrastructure(water/sewer, roads)is the greatest expense in <br /> urban areas. Urban developments recoup costs with higher density. Rural <br /> developments, without water/sewer,must have a minimum 1 acre lot size. Shorter <br /> roads can cut costs but with 200' being a generous length of road frontage for a 1 acre <br /> lot,at$30 a linear foot,the saving of$6,000 does not make up for the loss of a <br /> $20,000 1 acre lot.If clustering is desirable it should be doable otherwise it is <br /> downzoning. <br /> 2. If the 5 &2 zoning with cluster configuration is enacted,an accurate calculation should <br /> be made of the parcels in the watershed with acreage over 12 acres in sire. (A recent <br /> comment has been made that 25%of all existing parcels are over 12 acres in size). If an <br /> owner of one of those parcels decides to subdivide at any time after the date of <br /> downzoning enactment,an analysis should be made of the development potential(with <br /> soil,slope etc.constraints)at the 2 acre minimum zoning versus the 5 &2/cluster <br /> zoning.The difference in values should be compensated to that landowner by OWASA <br /> as a purchase of development rights held in perpetuity,or in a Land Bank for future <br /> transfer or for a TDR program with sufficient receiving areas designated to absorb such <br /> transfers. <br /> 3. It is fundamentally unfair to make a certain segment of the population pay for the <br /> benefits of another.Fair compensation is the honorable and equitable thing to do. <br /> C-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.