Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-1997 - 9e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 09-02-1997
>
Agenda - 09-02-1997 - 9e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2013 10:35:05 AM
Creation date
8/9/2013 10:35:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970902
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
RES-1997-045 University Manor Phase III Preliminary Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
36 <br /> Strayhorn asked about pedestrian and bicycle access. Mr.Mitchell <br /> responded that there will be typical NCDOT subdivision roads with twenty <br /> feet of pavement and ditches on each side. There will be no sidewalks. <br /> Hoecke commented that,in answer to a question from Allison regarding <br /> individual wells,that was listed as a fall-back plan in case of problems with <br /> the community wells or alternative sites for community wells. <br /> Searles asked when the need for the fall-back plan for individual wells <br /> would be determined. Cameron responded that if there were problems with <br /> the proposed community wells,alternative community wells will be drilled. <br /> If there are problems with the alternates,then individual wells can be <br /> drilled. <br /> Searles asked if a site analysis had been done and the number of suitable <br /> sites for individual wells. Mr.Mitchell responded that,with the size of the <br /> lots,individual wells could have been proposed. However,the advantage <br /> for the homeowner is to have a community system since it is regulated by <br /> the State and monitored on a regular basis.Cameron noted that a <br /> community system would also allow the lot owner more flexibility in the <br /> location of the house. <br /> Allison expressed concern if,at some point,the fall-back plan for <br /> individual wells had to be pursued,it would affect house locations and cost. <br /> Cameron responded that given the lot sizes,the"last resort"should still be a <br /> workable option. <br /> Barrows asked about the traffic impact study and the levels of service A,B, <br /> C,and D. Cameron responded that these are standard road classifications <br /> referring to the carrying capacity. She noted that Transportation Planner, <br /> Slade McCalip could better clarify that information later in the meeting. <br /> Price asked about the changes from the Concept Plan. Cameron responded <br /> that the changes in the roads and cul-de-sacs are the kinds of changes <br /> expected between Concept and Preliminary,when septic system locations <br /> have been determined. <br /> Selkirk asked if a study had been done to determine if the area designated <br /> for wells 5,6,and 7 is a good place to drill those wells. Mr.Mitchell <br /> responded that sufficient information to establish the best locations. The <br /> choice is based on experience from other sites. Given the amount of open <br /> space that is available,he expressed confidence that good well sites can be <br /> found. Selkirk asked the depth of such wells and the response was 400 to <br /> 500 feet deep. <br /> MOTION: Allison moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded <br /> by Walters. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.