Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 08-25-1997
>
Agenda - 08-25-1997 - C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2013 9:23:49 AM
Creation date
8/8/2013 9:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/1997
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970825
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 :219 <br /> Criterion A: Agricultural Trends in Orange County--Post-Bellum to Post-World War II <br /> Post-Bellum to the Late Nineteenth Century <br /> Orange County was among those areas that did not experience the physical devastation effected by the Civil <br /> War; however, the county did experience the social and economic transformation that proliferated throughout <br /> the South as a result of the abolition of slavery, lingering wartime poverty,and the depletion of capital. <br /> These circumstances slowed agricultural production and necessitated a reorganization of the ante-bellum <br /> social and economic systems(Mattson 1996, p. 35). During the ten years immediately following the Civil <br /> War in Orange County, farm value decreased by half and the average size fell from 285 acres to 198 acres <br /> (U.S. Census, 1860 and 1870). <br /> Ante-bellum Orange County maintained 6,000 slaves--one-third of the total population. Farmers contended <br /> with the adjustments necessary to deal with the labor shortage as many African American families migrated <br /> to urban areas in pursuit of job opportunities. As a result,a variety of methods were utilized to tenure the <br /> land in Orange County after the Civil War. Landowners either employed and supervised farm laborers or <br /> divided holdings into smaller plots. As major landholdings were parceled out,the overall number of farms <br /> increased and the rise in production of cash crops as a means of livelihood in a cash-poor economy resulted <br /> in the erosion of the traditional self-sufficient family farm(Mattson 1996,p.36-37). Tenant farming and <br /> share cropping became prevalent and in 1890,well over half of the county's farmers were either renters, <br /> sharecroppers,or laborers. More than a third of white farmers did not own land and over 20 percent were <br /> sharecroppers. Most Black farmers remained as field hands,a third were sharecroppers,and only a tenth <br /> became landowners. The average size of their farms was less than half that of farms operated by Whites. By <br /> the late 1800s almost 40 percent of all farmers in Orange County were sharecroppers and worked on average <br /> 20 to 60 acres of land. In the Cedar Grove Township,the typical amount of improved or tilled land per farm <br /> was 20 to 40 acres,while unimproved land or woodlands constituted anywhere from 20 to 150 acres(U.S. <br /> Census 1890-1900 as stated in Mattson 1996,p.38). <br /> With the decline of the self-sufficient farm and the growth in tenancy came the increased importance of the <br /> country crossroads store where a variety of goods could be conveniently purchased that were previously <br /> produced on the family farm. Another outgrowth of farm tenancy was new crop lien laws which benefited <br /> the owners of these general stores. Lien laws permitted merchants to accept unplanted crops as collateral in <br /> the purchase of seeds,fertilizer, and other supplies. In a post-war cash-poor economy,merchants took on a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.