Orange County NC Website
21 <br /> b. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br /> (1) Economic Development Districts Design Manual <br /> a) Article 3.2 Landscape Design <br /> Presentation by Mary Willis. <br /> This amendment is to consider an amendment to eliminate the 100-foot <br /> buffer requirement along the perimeter of an Economic Development <br /> District(EDD)which abuts an EDD adopted by another planning <br /> jurisdiction. <br /> Article 3.2 Landscape Design(page 3.2.6)of the EDD Design Manual <br /> requires a 100-foot buffer around the perimeter of an EDD in order to <br /> separate incompatible uses. <br /> The northernmost portion of the Orange County I-40/Old NC 86 EDD <br /> on the west side of Old NC 86 between Cates Creek and Oakdale Drive <br /> consists of a narrow strip of properties,ranging from 300 feet to 500 <br /> feet in depth. <br /> The area bounded by the east side of Old NC 86,Cates Creek and I-85 <br /> is in the jurisdiction of the Town of Hillsborough and is also zoned <br /> Economic Development District. Since Old NC 86 forms a perimeter <br /> boundary for both the Orange County and the Hillsborough EDDs <br /> between Cates Creek and Oakdale Drive,it is applied on both sides of <br /> Old NC 86 where the two districts abut. However,the uses which <br /> would be allowed adjacent to Old NC 86 in both districts are similar <br /> and not incompatible,thus the protection which the perimeter buffer is <br /> intended to provide is not needed. <br /> Property owners in the narrow strip of the Orange County EDD <br /> requested that the application of the perimeter buffer in that area be <br /> reconsidered due to the extent of development constraints it creates. <br /> On August 28, 1995,a proposal to eliminate the buffer requirement <br /> between two adjacent EDDs was presented for public hearing. On <br /> October 2, 1995,the Board of Commissioners tabled the item. There <br /> has been no further Board action. <br /> The previous discussion on the issue of the perimeter buffer by the <br /> Board of Commissioners and the Planning Board indicates concem for <br /> creating a desirable entranceway into Hillsborough. The Design <br /> Manual includes other standards that relate more directly to this <br /> concern. The perimeter buffer was created for a specific purpose not <br /> directly related to entranceway issues. <br /> The issue of the perimeter buffer was raised again by affected property <br /> owners during the recent development of a proposed site plan for the <br /> State Employees Credit Union. The Planning Staff recommends that it <br /> be reconsidered in the context of its purpose for separating <br /> incompatible uses rather than in the context of entranceway design. <br />