Orange County NC Website
1 12:54 80C MgNAGER <br /> 5/27/97 Public Hearing Minutes g <br /> 1 <br /> 2 June Haas,a resident of this area.indicated that the residents of this neighborhood have worked hard to <br /> 3 have the Economic Development District established and to have the proper zoning applied. They thought that this <br /> 4 change had already occurred. She requested that the Board of Commissioners adopt this change. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 A motion was marls by Commissioner Haikiods, seconded by Commission Brown, to refer this item to the <br /> T Planning Board to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 4, 1997. <br /> 8 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 9 2) Allowing Existing Residential Uses <br /> 10 . Article 2.2 Permitted Uses <br /> 11 The item was presented by Emiy Cameron in order to receive citizen <br /> 12 comment on a proposed amandmertt to allow existing residences as a permitted use in all Economic Development <br /> 13 Distracts. According to 20 Pem %d use table in the Economic Development Districts(EDO)Design AAanwi, <br /> 14 residential uses are not permitted in the Primary Development Aran.except for the Primary Overlay in the 1-40/01! <br /> 15 86 EDO. The purpose of the Economic DevNopment Districts is to provide locations for a wide range of non. <br /> 16 residentlal uses,including light industrial,distribution,OMice,service and retail. Residential use is allowed in <br /> 17 Secondary Development Areas and the Prhrary Ovsnay,which serve to buffer the EDO$from advent residential <br /> 18 disfttL <br /> 19 <br /> 20 CQWAEW8AN=g exAMMNs FRAY THIg 90ARD OF CO�IONE82-_Now. <br /> 21 <br /> • None. <br /> 24 CAttl>l .=ANIMOR QjMLjT10N2 FROM CrMEENS• None. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 A motion was made by Commissioner Carey.seconded by Commissioner Brown.to refer this ftm to the <br /> 27 Planning Board to be returned to the Board of Contmissiortea no sooner then August 4, 1997. <br /> 28 VOTE uwwlMous <br /> 29 <br /> 30 3) NC Highway 791 Connarxor <br /> 31 • Article 2.1 Development Areas <br /> 32 • Article 3.3.Circulation and Parking <br /> 33 This item was presented by Planner Mary Wilt in order W receive a tzen <br /> 34 comment on a proposed amendment to 9 n1r+ate aN referenCes to an extension o1 NC 761 between U.S.70 and l- <br /> 36 83 in the Econorttic oevebprrrent District Design M artuel. On March IS, 1997.the Board of Commissioners adopted <br /> 36 a Resalutieon repusatlnp deletion of the NC 7S1 contactor between US 70 and 146 from the Durhani4hapel H& <br /> 37' Canb0r0(DCHC)Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan. The eonn4CW is referenced in maps and bw pertair"to the I- <br /> 38 8W.S. Hwy 70 Econwnic Development District(EDO). The proposers amendment eliminates ill referercea to the <br /> 39 NC 751 connector in the EDO onign Manual. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Commission Gordon astoed tlor dJn Oration as to WhWW this ak0 ddeWs reference to Eno Drive. Mary <br /> 44 indittted that it did because without the connector Eno Drive is not relevant Deleting the reference is not a <br /> 45 statement about Eno Onve but inthm addresses the tact that without the contractor It Is not relevant. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Commissioner Cordon felt that the Board of Commissioners nrght choose to make a more current <br /> 48 staarrnnt about Eno Oda so nift.ie lo the near future. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 20111111101M AWWR R&MMOM FROM TH9 PtAMM 1111CARM None. <br /> 52 20NOEM ANOMR CKMENTICH111 ERM Cr=NS! None <br /> 53 <br /> 54 A..orlon was mode by Chair Carey,seconded by Commiseiorter Gordon,to refer this item to the Planning <br /> 53 Board to be returned to to Saw'of Commissioners no sooner than August 4, 199'7. <br /> s8 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 57 <br /> 5>d 4) Water 3 Sewer Service(update) <br />