Orange County NC Website
-S/27/3-7 PUBLIC A F4 F,3l; H IAWT'ES <br /> 15e1 6 <br /> 2 June Haas, a resident of this area,indicated that the residents of this neighbo&000d have worked hard to <br /> 3 have the Economic Development District established and to have the proper zoning applied. They thought that this <br /> 4 change had already occurred. She requested that the Board of Commissioners adopt this change. <br /> S <br /> 6 A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiods, seconded by Commission Brown, to refer this item to the <br /> T Ptammng Board to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 4, 1997. <br /> 8 VOTE. UNANIMOUS <br /> 9 2) - Allowing Existing Residential Uses <br /> 10 • Article 2.2 Permitted Uses <br /> 11 The item was presented by Emily Cameron in order to receive citizen <br /> 12 comment on a proposed amendment to avow existing residences as a permitted use in all Economic Development <br /> 13 Distr ts. According to me permitted use table in the Economic Development Districts(EDO)Design Manual, <br /> 14 residential uses are not permitted in the Primary Development Area, except for the Primary Overlay in the 1401013 <br /> 15 86 EDO. The purpose of the Economic Development Districts is to provide kcations for a wide range of non- <br /> 16 residential uses, including light industrial, distribution,office, service and retail. Residential use is allowed in <br /> 17 Secondary Development Areas and the Primary Overlay,which serve to buffer the EDO$from adjacent residentiai <br /> 18 districts. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 COMMg TS ANDIOR QUESTIONS FitOM TINE 80ASC OF CO ONERS: None. <br /> 22 CoWighn fi=g C UUMNS eanu THE PLANNING BOA -* None. <br /> 24 CMWAM AN=R QUFV—QN9 FROM C NS-=None. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 A motion was made by Commissioner Caney, seconded by Commissioner Brown, to refer this item to the <br /> 27' Planning Board to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August a, 1997. <br /> 28 VOTE UNANIMOUS <br /> 29 <br /> 30 3) NC Highway 751 Connector <br /> 31 . Article 2.1 Development Areas <br /> 32 • Article 3.3.Clrcuta w and Parking <br /> 33 This bm was presented by Planner Mary VWhs in order to receive citizen <br /> 34 comment on a proposed amendment to ellmirtaM aN references to an extension of NC 751 between U.S.70 and I- <br /> 35 85 in the Economic Oevelopmertt Oi:bict Design Manual On Marts 18. 1997.the Bosrd of C.ommieswrim adopted <br /> 36 a Resok tion revueft9 deletion of the NC 751 connector between US 70 and 1-46 ft om the Durham-Chapel HUB <br /> 37 Carrboro(DCHC)Urban Area Thoreughftwe Plan. The conneeW is r elm orcod in maps and text pertaining to the I- <br /> 38 8W.S. Hwy 70 Eoommic Developmwt District(EDO). The proposed amendment eliminates all references to the <br /> 39 NC 751 connect in the EDO Design Manual. <br /> MWj M ay .gig auMSMNs EMU THE BOARD OF COMMISSIOblAS: <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Commission Gordon asked far darifi mdw as to whether this also deletes reference to Eno Drive. Mary <br /> 44 indigted that it d'id because without the cwneclor Eno Drive is not reievart Deletin9 the rrferenca is not s <br /> 45 stadtiment about Eno Drive but rtatMr eddresses the fad that without the oonrtecaar R is not relevant. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Carxrrissww Gordon felt that ttre Board of Cottvnissioners might choose to melee a more current <br /> 48 statwrwnt about Erto Drive somMhne in the now f faun. <br /> - None. <br /> 31 <br /> 52 MUM&=ANDMOU12nMIKEIRIMCIERMI None: <br /> 53 <br /> 54 A., wss rstoo by Chew CWW,seconded by Commissioner Gordon,to refer this dent to the Ph w*V <br /> 56 Board to be retwnsd to the Board of Cantattssioners no sooner than August 4, 1997. <br /> 66 vOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 4) Wider b sewer Service(uPdaltr) <br />