Orange County NC Website
31 <br /> ash is no longer beneficially reused although it is no longer being landfilled at Orange <br /> Rezional Landfill. <br /> Discussion <br /> The table below shows progress towards the goal measured both by the State methodology <br /> and the methodology that the Owners Group has historically used. The waste reduction <br /> percentage goals for mixed solid waste, construction and demolition waste, and total waste <br /> landfilled change due to the change in base year. However, the actual tonnage and per capita <br /> targets do not change. <br /> A B C D El F G1 H I I J K <br /> 3 1 LOG INC i I 1 1 <br /> 4 1 Base year I Base Year I Goal Year I Goal Year <br /> 5 YIU 11988-89 1991-92 1 1995-96 ZQUI 29951 <br /> 6 Mixed Solid Waste tons 67,502 ' 65,981 ') 58,372 �'� 53,783 47,794 <br /> 7 Mixed Solid Waste (tons/capita 0.76 0.69 0.55 0.46 0.38 <br /> 8 Percent reduction versus 1988-89 n/a 10% 28% 40% 50% <br /> 9 Percent reduction versus 1991-92 n/a n/a 19% 33% 44% <br /> 10 Construction&Demolition Waste tons 31,624 1211 34,145 1 31,452 1 1 34,0751 1 18,621 <br /> 11 Construction&Demolition (tons/capita 0.36 0.35 1 0.30 0.29 1 1 0.15 <br /> 12 Percent reduction versus 1995-96 n/a n/a n/a 4%1 1 50% <br /> 13 Percent reduction versus 1991-92 n/a n/a I n/a 20% 58% <br /> 14 ITotal MSW+C&D landfilled tons 99,126 1 100,126 89,824 1 87,8581 1 66,415 <br /> 15 Total MSW+C&D landfilled (tons/capita 1.12 1.04 0.85 1 0.751 1 0.53 <br /> 16 Percent reduction versus 1988-89 n/a 7% 24% 1 33% 53% <br /> 17 Percent reduction versus 1991-92 n/a n/a 18% 28% 49% <br /> 18 Other Materials base ear/landlilled <br /> 19 Coal Ash,Yardwaste,Whhe Goods 9,996 (3) 30,206 131 - - <br /> 20 Tires - 736 1 557 649 692 <br /> 21 ITotal Other Materials 9,996 30,941 1 557 649 692 <br /> 22 Total Tons Managed(be r Aandfilled 109,122 131,067 90,381 1 88,506 67,106 <br /> 23 Total tons managed/landfilled(per capita) 1.23 1.36 0.85 0.75 0.54 <br /> 24 Percent reduction versus 1988-89 n/a -10%1- 31%1 39% 1 57% <br /> 25 Percent reduction versus 1991-92 n/a I I n/a 1 37% 45% 61% <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Population 88,484 96,302 105,821 117,500 csi 125,300 5j <br /> 29 Notes: <br /> 30 1.This tonnage includes recycled materials in the base ear,per guidance from State Solid Waste section <br /> 31 2.This tonnage is estimated at 1/3 of tonnage landfilled. <br /> 32 3.This tonnage includes an estimate for white goods although they were diverted. <br /> 33 4.This tonnage includes waste landfilled out of county from state records.. <br /> 34 S. Future population projections from Office of State Planning May 1997. <br /> If the Owners Group wishes to adhere to its adopted goals of reducing total waste landfilled <br /> 33% by 2001 and 50% by 2006 versus a 1988-89 base year, but use the new state base year <br /> of 1991-92, the table above shows the new percentages for mixed solid waste, construction <br /> and demolition waste and total waste that should be adopted as the target goals to make the <br /> tonnage reductions consistent with the earlier goals. <br /> In the table, Row 8, compares the percent reduction in the amount of mixed solid waste <br /> landfilled per capita in 2001 and 2006 to the original base year of 1988-89. Row 9 shows <br /> the percent reduction compared to the 1991-92 base year. Note that the total tons of mixed <br /> solid waste landfilled(Row 6) and the per capita landfilled (Row 7) are the same; the <br /> percentages change only due to a change in the base year. Similar information is presented <br /> for construction and demolition waste (Rows 10-13), the total of mixed waste and <br /> 2 <br />