Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-30-1997 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 06-30-1997
>
Agenda - 06-30-1997 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2013 9:53:49 AM
Creation date
7/30/2013 9:53:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/30/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970630
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> 6 <br /> • ?financial savings from waste reduction may be cancelled <br /> out for residents by the non-deductibilit-y, of garbage <br /> fees from federal taxes where local property taxes are <br /> deductible . <br /> • Can be perceived as an additional tax, especially if <br /> taxes are not reduced when unit-based pricing is <br /> implemented. <br /> Collection Bans (Mandatory Recycling) With Differential Landfill <br /> Fees <br /> An alternative to unit-based pricing fees as a primanr waste prevention <br /> strategy is collection bans (mandatory recycling) . These bans could be <br /> applied to a variety of materials in a variety of sectors . The bans <br /> could be most effective if coupled with differential fees at the <br /> landfill . Thus, those haulers who choose not to enforce collection bans <br /> would still be subject to penalties if their loads are in violation of <br /> landfill regulations . This combination of collection bans and <br /> differential landfill fees is now in place in Orange County for <br /> commercially generated, recyclable corrugated cardboard and all yard <br /> waste . <br /> Reported Waste Diversion <br /> Compared with unit-based pricing fees, fewer communities that we are <br /> aware of, have instituted widespread collection bans . Locally, Alamance <br /> County reports a 3416 decline in waste generation with their collection <br /> ban/differential landfill fee system. The system was instituted at the <br /> same time as recycling programs . Mitchell County has instituted <br /> collection bans at sanitation sites . They report a 4016 waste reduction <br /> at those sites . Islip New York reports a 9516 recycling bin set out rate <br /> and diversion of 48 pounds of recyclable containers and paper per <br /> household per month. That recycling rate is double our local <br /> residential recycling rate . <br /> Our anecdotal research with other communities who have used these bans <br /> for longer periods seems to show that if enforce_n.ent or education <br /> efforts are reduced, compliance with the bans drops . When enforcement 1s <br /> stepped up, compliance_ increases . <br /> Advantages of Collection Bans <br /> • Easy to implement and understand. <br /> • Can be enforced at the point of disposal . <br /> • Applies equally to all generators . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.