Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-30-1997 - 8dd
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 06-30-1997
>
Agenda - 06-30-1997 - 8dd
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2013 4:57:00 PM
Creation date
7/29/2013 4:56:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/30/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8dd
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970630
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
RES-1997-031 Resolution of Approval Section One Beaver Valley
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> DRAFT 6-4-97 PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES <br /> DRAFTPrice referred to Mace Road and Hoover Road and asked Barrows if it <br /> was a policy to try and keep driveways on cul de sacs rather than major <br /> thoroughfares.Barrows stated that she had asked that question in the past <br /> referring to development along Pleasant Green Road and efforts to <br /> provide internal access rather than"dumping"more traffic onto Pleasant <br /> Green Road. <br /> The surveyor for the development,Steve Yuhasz,responded this was <br /> different from Pleasant Green Road which is already an existing state <br /> road. Even though this may,at some point,connect Mace Road and <br /> Hoover Road,it really is an internal subdivision road that is being built <br /> and probably will carry the amount of traffic for this subdivision. <br /> Willis noted that there is also a provision in the ordinance that corner lots <br /> access the road of lesser classification. From that standpoint,access <br /> should be required to the two cul de sacs. <br /> Barrows asked what is intended for open space B. Yuhasz responded that <br /> it is intended to remain as natural as possible to protect the creek and the <br /> applicant noted the possible construction of walking trails. <br /> Selkirk asked about the use of funds in payment-in-lieu. Willis <br /> responded that any funds that are spent from payment-in-lieu fees go <br /> towards public facilities. <br /> Searles asked about the intent of phasing,A,B and C.Kirk responded <br /> that the intent is to construct the phases as indicated. As they move <br /> through the phases,roads must be constructed or security provided for <br /> road construction prior to final approval of each phase. <br /> Price noted that lot 8 is in Phase A and the cul de sac which it accesses is <br /> in Phase C. Yuhasz responded that the intention was to allow the lots in <br /> Phase A to access the main road. There would still be enough lots in <br /> Phase C to meet the density requirements for state maintenance. He <br /> continued that the intent is to provide the greatest number of lots in the <br /> initial phase to get the process started. <br /> Selkirk asked about the access road for lot 41 and if it would <br /> accommodate emergency vehicles. Kirk responded that it is a long <br /> driveway rather than an access road. Yuhasz agreed that while it is a long <br /> driveway,it will accommodate emergency vehicles. <br /> Yuhasz noted that the open space that is in Section One is greater than the <br /> minimum requirement. When Section Two is presented,the open space <br /> will probably be a little less than the minimum required. However,in <br /> aggregate,the whole thing together does meet the open space <br /> requirement. <br /> MOTION: Strayhom moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. <br /> Seconded by Selkirk. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.