Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-05-1997 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 06-05-1997
>
Agenda - 06-05-1997 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2013 10:20:35 AM
Creation date
7/29/2013 10:20:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/1997
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970605
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> 7 <br /> Greater potential for diversion if enforcement level is high and <br /> Liaintained over time . <br /> Disadvantages of Collection Bans <br /> • Enforcement requires regular and continuing inspection of solid <br /> waste containers for violations that will require either additional <br /> personnel to maintain the present solid waste collection <br /> productivity. <br /> NOTE: Islip, New York, which has mandatory recycling, reports use <br /> of 7 inspectors to police 78 , 000 households plus one supervisor. <br /> The inspectors also handle solid waste complaints . <br /> • Enforcement with no alternative means for handling banned materials <br /> may lead to resistance to the program and illegal dumping. <br /> O Difficult to determine if those using dumpsters are in-compliance <br /> since most material is bagged in opaque garbage bags . <br /> • Inflexible in the face of changing markets and processing <br /> technologies for different materials that may or may not be subject <br /> to the initial ban. <br /> O Requires subjective judgment on the part of each solid waste <br /> cofiector and landfill inspector regarding tolerance levels, i .e. <br /> How many cans are too many? Was paper mixed with solid waste <br /> contaminated at the source or when it was mixed into the waste? <br /> • Regulatory approach may be resisted by the public . <br /> 3 . Decide whether to provide universal collection of solid waste and <br /> recyclables or to continue current drolo-off site collections . <br /> The system recommended by the Owners Group includes universal collection <br /> of solid waste and recyclables . <br /> Currently universal collection of solid waste is provided to the urban <br /> residential, multifamily and commercial sectors . Universal collection <br /> of recyclables is provided to the urban residential sector and most <br /> multifamily units . <br /> Universal collection of solid waste and recyclables curre*itly does not <br /> exist for the unincoroorated residential sector; however solid waste <br /> convenience centers are crovided for self-hauled disposal of waste . <br /> Also universal collection of recyclables does not exist in the <br /> corL=ercial sector . Change to a Universal collection system would have <br /> the mCSt impact throughout the unincorpora-ed area followed by t:1e <br /> commercial sector . <br /> A summan/ table of how services are provided in each jurisd?cz;on 1S <br /> attachment 1 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.