Browse
Search
NS ORD-1997-012 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments - Golf Course Standards
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 1990-1999
>
1997
>
NS ORD-1997-012 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments - Golf Course Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2013 2:41:27 PM
Creation date
7/23/2013 12:33:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-21-1997 - 9c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 05-21-1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
44 <br /> 3 <br /> 1 This item was Presented by Emily Cameron for the purpose of receiving clam cornmeni on proposW <br /> 2 amendments to the Inning OldirMuVe to irctu le standards for got courses. On August 20. 1946. the Bo of <br /> 3 Ccmmissiorrsrs adopted a charge and app�ortmted members to the Golf Course Amendment Review Task Faroe(Gdf CARTy, <br /> 4 The Golf CART begarm meeting kt September 1998 and corlfirxted )b work through Febl, of 1997. At the and of <br /> 5 December, a draft was dkhtx led to ZT apenejes and individuals.for review and comment, inn kxdirtg the irtstltute of <br /> 6 Government,stabs agencies involved with water quaZy and pesticide MWAafions,the Recreation and Parks Advisory Coin, <br /> 7 the US Gdf Association, the National Association of CountiM US Finaarxrrental Protection Agency, the Gaff Came <br /> 8 Saperirtertdertts Association of America, the American Society.of Gott Case Architects, and the Center for Resource <br /> 9 Management Twelve responses were received Written comments were part of the agenda packet. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 COMMENTS AND/OR QUES'T'IONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMmmiONERS: <br /> 12 Commissioner Gordon mentioned that the Permitted Use Table previously aAowed Golf Courses as a matter of <br /> 13 right in more districts than the current table does Including commercial districts. She felt that it would make sense to <br /> 14 allow golf courses in some of those districts by Special Use Permit_ She requested that the Planning Board disatsa this <br /> 15 further. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Ma,Cameron mentioned that the debate was lengthy on this issue. The end point of the discussion was that <br /> 18 the CART members were attempting to be consistent with the description of the districts. At the same time,in a <br /> 19 practical sense,the acreage is limited for the commercial uses. The possibility of undeveloped existing commercial <br /> 20 lard existing which could be used for a golf course development where it would not already be permitted Is very <br /> 21 unlikely. She assured Commissioner Gordon that the Planning Board would revisit this issue. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Commissioner Brown requested clarification on Attorney Gledhill's comments regarding pesticides. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Ms.Cameron mentioned that there is a section in the NC General Statutes that preempts local jurisdictions <br /> 26 from adopting regulations whk:h-would address,in any way,the applications to use or store pesticides. It is very <br /> 27 specific with regard to the limit it puts on local jurisdictions.The CART included information in the Initial draft regarding <br /> 20 pesticide use,safety,notification,storage areas,etc.,primarily for Information. Because of the General Statutes they <br /> 29 were required to delete them from the initial draft of this document. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD: None. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 COMMENTS/WD/OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS: <br /> 34 Allen Span,a member of the CART Committee,thanked Emily Cameron for the excellent staff support that she <br /> 35 provided to the group. He mentioned that this group was not and-golf and,in fad,the golf Interest was well <br /> 36 represented. The goal of this group was to regulate,not prohibit,golf courses. He requested that the Board of <br /> 37 Commissioners seek to repeal the State's preemption provision regarding pesticides. This group had agreed to several <br /> 38 provisions which would have further protected against the negative effects of pesticides. He felt that this purging was <br /> 39 unfortunate and weakened the proposed Ordinance. He stated that them is a real need for voluntary compliance with <br /> 40 higher standards. Finally,he mentioned that the Audubon Certification known as*Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary <br /> 41 System' does not actually place any restrictions on golf course operations. He requested that the Commissioners <br /> 42 maintain oversight control. His comments in their entirety are in the permanent agenda file In the Clerk's o". <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Kent Scott commented that he actually had came prepared to discuss the Audubon intematkwW Certification. <br /> 45 He mentioned that he has had several discussions with Ronald Datsun,with Audubon International,who sent him <br /> 46 information, incwding a video tape. He felt that it was potentially a very good program and requested that the Board of <br /> 47 Commissioners read the material and watch the video. The Audobon Irttematkmal actually works with new constnnction <br /> 48 of golf courses for a substantial fee. They also work with the staff of the courses to assure that they understand how to <br /> 49 maintain the courses without damaging the environment. He felt that using this company could be a good way to <br /> 50 maintain a NO standard without having to hire an engineer to handle the job. <br /> 51 <br /> 52 Ride Robbins,a member of the Golf CART,mentioned that he supported the of this <br /> 53 committee. He felt that got(courses are a very good use in industrial and commercial areas. They help to buffer other <br /> 54 uses. The fad that Orange County does not have any large.unused con in ka &I areas,Is no reason to delete them <br /> 55 from the Use Tables. Zoning does change and they am not a toad use in those areas, Golf Courses are sometimes <br /> 56 singled out as a bad use of land:the science does not back up that cormem. He requested that golf courses not be <br /> 57 sktpkd out for regulations over and above other uses. <br /> 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.