Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-21-1997 - 10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 05-21-1997
>
Agenda - 05-21-1997 - 10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2013 2:37:51 PM
Creation date
7/22/2013 2:37:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970521
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 19 <br /> minimal growth in town programs. County <br /> assumption of responsibility for most facilities and <br /> services at some future time when capacity to perform <br /> and community acceptability has been demonstrated. <br /> b. Advantages: Same as in 1 b, but attained over time <br /> with enhanced opportunity for acceptance. The <br /> County is in the best position to be the lead agent in <br /> funding, acquisition, and maintenance for an expanded <br /> capital program. This role can position the County to <br /> become the primary provider of facilities and programs <br /> and to be accepted as such. Transfer of existing major <br /> park ownership and maintenance responsibility to <br /> County may be an interim step. <br /> C. Disadvantages: Same as 1 c except community <br /> acceptance and transition problems would be reduced. <br /> 3. Program management by Carrboro or Chapel Hill. <br /> a. Description: lnterlocal agreements to assign <br /> countywide responsibility to one town. <br /> b. Advantages: Reduced administrative responsibility and <br /> cost for one town and the County. Benefits of <br /> coordination, such as economy of scale and more <br /> effective use of resources would be realized for <br /> operating programs. <br /> C. Disadvantages: The operating town would have <br /> responsibility without control of revenues. Potential <br /> for intergovernmental disagreement on annual funding. <br /> Little benefit for capital program because an <br /> intergovernmental process for facility-planning and <br /> capital funding would still be necessary. Benefits <br /> would be limited to those associated with operations <br /> coordination. <br /> 4. Independent governmental authority (independent park <br /> district) <br /> a. Description: Independent governmental unit <br /> established for the purpose of providing park facilities <br /> and services. Powers to tax and issue bonds <br /> independently from other governing agencies. Board <br /> of directors may be either elected or appointed by <br /> existing governing boards. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.