Orange County NC Website
6 <br /> student/teacher ratios than the LEA schools that compete with them. They are able to do this by <br /> increasing the number of teachers relative to non-instructional staff. It should be no surprise that <br /> most private schools operate in this way too. <br /> The group of parent activists that I belong to has already forced the CHCCS to direct a <br /> larger proportion of their manpower into the class room. During the 1995 school board election <br /> we attacked the CHCCS administration-for adding only two instructional staff out of a total head <br /> count increase of 17. They got the message and did a much better job in 1996. Once we have a <br /> few charter schools in operation, you can be sure that the number of non-instructional staff in the <br /> CHCCS will start to fall. The figures for September 1995 and 1996 are based on CHCCS <br /> "Opening of School Reports". The numbers for 1997 and 1998 reflect what could happen if <br /> charter schools are allowed to succeed in North Carolina: <br /> 9/95 9/96 9/97 9/98 <br /> Increase in students(ADM) from previous year 251 274 300 325 <br /> Additional instructional staff 2 91 100 110 <br /> Additional service and administration star 15 47 7 -30 <br /> I believe that the Village Charter School and future charter schools will force the CHCCS <br /> to add muscle and cut the fat. Successful charter schools set an example by putting children and <br /> teachers before administrators or service personnel. I can understand that this makes the <br /> education establishment feel threatened. Change is scary. What troubles me is that they should <br /> attempt to influence you with mis-information. I therefore respectfWly request that FREE be <br /> represented at any meetings you have with the CHCCS administration when charter schools will <br /> be discussed. <br /> Looking beyond Chapel FEII, charter schools are transforming education elsewhere in the <br /> United States and in other countries. For example, since '1991, government schools in the United <br /> Kingdom have improved year on year. A comparable improvement in North Carolina would raise <br /> us thirty places, to #17 out of 50 states in SAT scores. Charter schools (known as "Grant <br /> Maintained Schools" in the UK) were the catalyst for this turnaround, even though they still <br /> account for less than 6% of students in the UK (700,000 students in 1996). This rather large <br /> scale experiment has shown that a modest investment in charter schools can have a huge effect on <br /> government schools as a whole. <br /> I expect that North Carolina's charter schools will be even more successful than the <br /> British ones because we are learning from their mistakes and because our schools will be smaller <br /> and more innovative. The British Education Reform Act of 1988 encouraged the conversion of <br /> existing public schools to independent status. Consequently, British charter schools have an <br /> average of over 600 students. North Carolina's HB 955 encourages the establishment of new <br /> schools with a likely average of under 200 students. This will help our charter schools to be true <br /> "Community Schools" with great potential benefits as the following quotations suggest: <br /> "The child is not educated to return home and be of use to the place and community; he or she is <br /> educated to leave home and earn money in a provisional future that has nothing to do with the <br /> place or community. The local schools no longer serve the local community, they serve the <br /> government's economy and the economy's government. Unlike the local community, the <br /> government and the economy cannot be served with affection, but only with professional zeal or <br /> professional boredom. Professionalism means more interest in salary and less interest in what <br /> lobbyl.doc page 2 of 3 <br />