Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-01-1997 - 9a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 04-01-1997
>
Agenda - 04-01-1997 - 9a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2013 2:29:45 PM
Creation date
7/12/2013 2:29:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9a
Document Relationships
1997 S Planning - DS Atlantic for Consultant Contract - Cedar Grove Rural Historic District National Register Nomination
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\1990's\1997
Minutes - 19970401
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 y <br /> (continued) District was identified as one of the priority preservation goals in the Historic <br /> Preservation Element, or Preservation Plan, which was adopted by the BOCC on April 1, <br /> 1996. Establishment of the Cedar Grove Historic District was adopted as a BOCC goal <br /> on May 14, 1996. <br /> Before proceeding with the selection of a consultant and completion of the National <br /> Register nomination, the HPC wanted to estimate support for a National Register <br /> nomination within the Cedar Grove crossroads community. (Under federal law, a <br /> proposed historic district will not be nominated to the National Register if a majority <br /> of property owners opposes such a designation.) Letters of interest, along with <br /> National Register information, were mailed to the twenty-five(25)Cedar Grove <br /> crossroads area property owners (see Attachment#4). The letter invited landowners <br /> to attend the October 24 meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission, which was <br /> held at the Cedar Grove United Methodist Church. <br /> Five (5) property owners, representing eight (8) of the thirty-two (32) properties within <br /> the crossroads area, attended the meeting. The HPC presented information about the <br /> historical significance of Cedar Grove and the process of listing on the National Register. <br /> Planning Staff and HPC members also answered questions from the attendees. <br /> Following the meeting, another letter was mailed on October 30 to each Cedar Grove <br /> crossroads area property owner (see Attachment #5). This mailing included a "straw <br /> vote" response form on the question of National Register listing. (A postcard reminder <br /> was mailed on November 21.) Responses were received from seventeen (17) out of <br /> twenty-five(25)addressees. Eleven(11)responses were in favor of listing of Cedar Grove <br /> on the National Register, and six(6) responses were not in favor of the designation. The <br /> two churches within the proposed district, Eno Presbyterian and Cedar Grove United <br /> Methodist, returned petitions in support of the National Register proposal (see Attachment <br /> #6). <br /> Although the "straw vote" confirms the HPC's view that the Cedar Grove crossroads <br /> community generally supports the National Register nomination, it should not be construed <br /> as the decisive vote on National Register listing. After submission of a nomination to the <br /> National Register Advisory Committee, there is a formal process for objecting to a <br /> Propos�d bed• <br /> An earlier report prepared by Planning Staff, which describes previous efforts regarding <br /> the Cedar Grove National Register nomination, is provided as Attachment#7 <br /> If the contract is approved, Ms. Graybeal would begin work on May 1, with the project <br /> expected to be completed by July 31. A recommendation from the HPC to consider the <br /> nomination at the August 25 Public Hearing would be forthcoming at their meeting on July <br /> 23. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the contract. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.