Agenda - 04-01-1997 - 8i - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

February 24, 1997 Public Hearing Minutes 6 1 Craig Thompson,a Task Force member,commended the work of this group. He is a golf course 2 suPerIntendent He felt that this is a good document One concern that he has is over regulating golf courses while 3 ignoring other pow►harmful land uses. For example,Walmart;schools. The other concem he has is how the 4 docununt will be Interpreted and who will be charged with that task He asked that the County Attorney Ioo1r at this 5 issues. He asked that the Special Use Permit not be used for the 9011'course process and that the deflnil o k in the 6 document be ee<efi,lly established. 7 a Ben Lbyd spoke in support of the game of golf as a past time in our county. He mentioned that he has 9 discussed this docwnent with a builder m another state who felt that our regulations would prohibit him from building 10 a golf course in our county. He felt&W golf courses have many a vironfm"benefltg. They are not harmful. He 11 felt that this document was too strict 12 13 A motion was made by Commissioner Carey.Jr.,seconded by Corrxrmissioner Brown,to refer the Proposed 14 amendments to the Planning Board for a reconi nmwistion to be Ntumed to the Board of Commissioners no sooner 15 than May 5. 1997. 16 VOTE: UNANIMO S 17 18 (c) Re-approval of Special Use Permits 19 1) Article 8.8.24 Historic Skes Non-Residential Use/Mixed Use 20 (Class A Special Use) 21 This item was presented by May VWNS for the purpose of receiving citizen comment 22 on a proposed amendment which would allow the Board of Commissioners to re-approve Special Use Permits for 23 non-residenWi use of historic sites upon receipt of a report from Me Planning Staff that the use has n aftWned 24 compbrios with the provisions d the Special Use permit On April 1,1966.the Zoning Ordinance was amended to 25 allow historic structures outside of activity nodes to be used for non-residential purposes. The use is allowed with 26 approval of a Class A Special Use Permit in the Agrkultural Residential(AR),Rural Residential(RI)and Rural Buffer 27 (RB)zoning districts. A lima limit of six years was included to provide for a periodic review to assure that the integrity 28 of the historic sift was maintained. Continuation of the use beyond six years requires re-approval by the Board of 29 Commissioners. ReApproval under aunent regulations requires submittaE of a new application and preparation of 30 pulft hearing agenda rnaterab,as if it WON a new use. Special Use permits for non-nesidendal use of htsUorac sites 31 have been.approvtd by the Board of Commissioners for the Bingham School Inn,The Old P4M Green Hill and 32 Reba amd Roses, There are no known instances of no or citizen complaints concern any of these uses. 33 The proposed amendment would allow the Board of Commissioners to re-approve special use pern ib for non- 34 residential use of historic sites at a regular meeting.upon receiving a compliance report from Planning Staff.If 35 corm roe has been maintained.then the permit could be re-approved. If compliance has not been maintained.then 36 the permit would expire at the end of its&year time limit. In that case,the applicant could submit a new application, 37 as if it were a new use. Likewise,submittal of a new application would be required if modification of the or*W permit 38 was proposed 39 40 COMMENTS A_NDMR QUESTIOM FROM THE BOARD OF C NM: None 41 42 None 43 44 COMNEW773 R QUESTONS FROM GMT= None. 45 46 A matron vas made by Commissioner Gordon,seconded by Commissioner Carey,Jr..to refer the Proposed 47 amendment b tAt Planning Board fora m be returned to the Board of Corrrrmioners no sooner 48 than April 1,19W 49 VOTE UNANMIK= 50 51 4. Subdivision Regulamtions Text Amendments 52 (a) Section IV-8-10 Fledble Development Section 8-Applicability 53 This itenn was heard concunwd with C1. 54