Agenda - 04-01-1997 - 8b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

24 ARTICLE 7-SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (Continued) PLANNING BOARD OF BOARD EVIDENCE SUBMITTED COMMISSIONERS FINDINGS TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS Ordinance Requirements Article 7.4 then indicates the application must comply with certain specific requirements common to all Planned Developments. These include: 7.4.1 So located with respect to _x—Yes No Access is provided via a Yes No major streets and mass transit private drive off of Friends facilities and designed so as not School Road(SR 1719). No to create traffic on minor streets minor residential streets will in residential districts. be affected by this project as proposed. 7.4.2 So located with respect to _x—Yes No The proposed development will Yes No water,sewer and storm drainage not have access to public facilities that enlargement or water,sewer or storm drainage extension will not result in facilities;therefore,no higher net public cost or earlier higher net public cost will incursion of public cost. result. aad So located with respect to police, _x—Yes No Letters regarding adequate Yes No fire and rescue services,and service provision have been schools and parks so as to have received from the Sheriffs access in the same manner as Department,and fire and permitted under the existing zoning. rescue services. 7.4.3 Site suitable for _x Yes No The area south of the pond is Yes No development within hazard from not detailed on the Flood flooding,erosion,and soil Insurance Rate Maps. The subsidence of slipping. Orange County Soil Survey does not indicate soils subject to flooding in this area. Slopes adjacent to the drainageways average 10% gradient. Drainage easements are provided to accommodate drainageways. *Finding affected by modification,PD-1-97