Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-18-1997 - 10a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 03-18-1997
>
Agenda - 03-18-1997 - 10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2013 2:42:09 PM
Creation date
7/11/2013 2:42:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/18/1997
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970318
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 1 <br /> 9 <br /> PROJECT NAMES UCC LIVING CENTER PROJECT NUMB Rs 053-NEOS1 PAGES 4 <br /> X. INCOME APPROACH TO VALUES <br /> 1. ESTIMATED R=9LZNXNG ECONOMIC LIFE 0 YEARS S. VALIIE OF LELM FEa (3? ANY) <br /> ZNCOME APPROACH TO VALUES GROUND REST $ 0 / CAP. RATE 0.00 <br /> 2. CAPITALIZATION RATE DES BY -OVERALL RATE PROM COMPARABLE PROJECTS VALUE OF LEASZD FEE $ 0 <br /> -RATE PROM SAND OF INVESTMENT -CASE FLOW TO EQUITY <br /> 3. RATE SELECTED 0.00 1 <br /> 4. (NET INCOME (LINE r 34)..............$ 0 <br /> S. CAPITALIZED VALUE (LINE 4 / L33M 3)..$ 0 <br /> L. COMPARISON APPROACH TO VALUES <br /> 7. ADDRESS FOR COMPARABLE SALE DATE SALE PRICE NO. UNITS <br /> B. / / $ 0 0 <br /> C. / / $ 0 0 <br /> S. INDICATED VALUE OF SUBJECT BY COMPARISON: $ 0 <br /> APPRAISAL SUMMARY <br /> 9. CAPITALIZATIONs $ 0 SUMMATION: $ 2,893,313 COMPARISON: $ 0 <br /> mm ?AIR NAR1= VALUE (OR -q"%A=m=T COST) OF 'PEA' PROPERTY, AS Or THE OATS 3ELON, IS S 0 <br /> N. TO BE COMPLETED 3Y CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYST: N. :'EIS SECTION NOT =3 USE AT THIS Tim <br /> COST NOT AT7M BUTA= TO DNELLZEG USE <br /> 10. PARSING.........................$ 7,200 <br /> 11. GARAGE..........................$ 0 <br /> 12. COMMERCIAL......................$ 0 <br /> 13. SPECIAL. ?.2T. LAND IMPROVEMENTS—$ 0 <br /> 14. OTHER...........................$ 121,400 <br /> 15. TOTAL...............$ 128,600 <br /> 6.4024 % <br /> TOTAL 3ST. COST OP OFF-S= REQUIREMENTS- <br /> 16. OFFSIT°.S EST. COST <br /> SANITARY SES+ER $ 0 <br /> $ 0 <br /> $ 0 <br /> $ 0 <br /> $ o <br /> $ 0 <br /> 17. TOTAL OPr-SIT-W...............$ 0 <br /> O. REMARKS. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGW TVR°S: <br /> --- SEE AT-AC3ED RE.YARES.;HEFT <br /> (ARC3I--{Cl-�m AL PROCESSOR) <br /> (v)►LaAT2 PJIOCSSSdt) (DATE) E ( ON REVSENmt) <br /> (COST PRO%ZZSSOR) (Dom) L (Cos; EVEM4N1 . <br /> •-- SEE AT—ACHES CONCLUSIONS SHELr' <br /> `(P - R 30US�G(DEVELIOPMZXTl (DATE) <br /> (FIELD OPPICE MANAGER/DEPUTY) (DATE) <br /> RUN DATE/TS.%lZ: 39/17/96 / 10:07:11 FORM 300-92264 (2-09) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.