Browse
Search
PH ORD-1997-004 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Historic Sites Non-Residential Use Mixed Use
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 1990-1999
>
1997
>
PH ORD-1997-004 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Historic Sites Non-Residential Use Mixed Use
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2013 4:23:39 PM
Creation date
7/11/2013 12:25:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/24/1997
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C-3c
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-24-1997 - C3c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1997\Agenda - 02-24-1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> 2) Article 6.30 Extra Requirements for the Stoney Creek Basin <br /> Overlay District <br /> This item was heard concurrent with Item C1(a). <br /> (b) _Gaff Courses <br /> 1) Article 4.3 Permitted Use Table <br /> 2) Article 6.16.10 Additional Requirements for Certain Permitted Uses <br /> Recreational Facilities(Profit(Non-Profit):Golf Club and Golf <br /> Country dub. <br /> 3) Article 6.23 Watershed Protection Overlay Districts <br /> 4) Article 22 Definitions-Golf Course <br /> 5) Article 8.8.7 Special Uses(Golf Courses) <br /> This item was presented by Emily Cameron for the purpose of receiving citizen comment on propose <br /> amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to include standards for golf courses. On August 20, 1996, the Board c <br /> Commissioners adopted a charge and appointed members to the Golf Course Amendment Review Task Force (Go <br /> CART). The Golf CART began meeting in September 1996 and continued its work through February of 1997. At the end c <br /> December, a draft was distributed to 27 agencies and individuals for review and comment, including the Institute c <br /> Government, state agencies involved with water quality and pesticide regulations, the Recreation and Parks Advisor <br /> Council, the US Golf Association, the National Association of Counties, US Environmental Protection Agency, the Go <br /> Course Superintendents Association of America, the American Society of Golf Course Architects, and the Center fc <br /> Resource Management Twelve responses were received: Written comments were part of the agenda packet <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: <br /> Commissioner Gordon mentioned that the.Permitted Use Table previously allowed Golf Courses as a matter of righ <br /> in more districts than the current table does including commercial districts. She felt that It would make sense to allow golf <br /> courses in some of those districts by Special Use Permit She requested that the Planning Board discuss this further. <br /> Ms.Cameron mentioned that the debate was lengthy on this issue. The end point of the discussion was that the <br /> CART members were attempting to be consistent with the description of the districts. At the same time, In a practical <br /> sense,the acreage is limited for the commercial uses. The possibility of undeveloped existing commercial land existing <br /> which could be used for a golf course development where it would not already be permitted is very unlikely. She assured <br /> Commissioner Gordon that the Planning Board would revisit this issue. <br /> Commissioner Brown requested clarification on Attorney Gledhill's comments regarding pesticides. <br /> Ms.Cameron mentioned that there is a section In the NC General Statutes that preempts local jurisdictions from <br /> adopting regulations which would address,in any way,the applications to use or store pesticides. It is very specific with <br /> regard to the limit it puts on local jurisdictions.The CART Included information in the initial draft regarding pesticide use, <br /> safety,notification,storage areas,etc.,primarily for information. Because of the General Statutes they were required to <br /> delete them from the initial draft of this document <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD: None. <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS: <br /> Allen Spalt,a member of the CART Committee,thanked Emily Cameron for the excellent staff support that she <br /> provided to the group. He mentioned that this group was not antl-golf and,in fact,the golf interest was well represented. <br /> The goal of this group was to regulate,not prohibit,golf courses. He requested that the Board of Commissioners seek to <br /> repeal the State's preemption provision regarding pesticides. This group had agreed to several provisions which would hav( <br /> further protected against the negative effects of pesticides. He felt that this purging was unfortunate and weakened the <br /> proposed Ordinance. He stated that there is a real need for voluntary compliance with higher standards. Finally,he <br /> mentioned that the Audubon Certification known as"Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary System' does not actually place any <br /> restrictions on golf course operations. He requested that the Commissioners maintain oversight control. His comments in <br /> their entirety are in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office. <br /> Kent Scut commented that he actually had come prepared to discuss the Audubon International Certification. He <br /> mentioned that he has had several discussions with Ronald Datsun,with Audubon International,who sent him infomiation, <br /> including a video tape. He felt that it was potentially a very good program and requested that the Board of Commissioners <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.