Orange County NC Website
2111197 Final Draft Page 5 <br /> of the ordinance would not be large enough in proportion to the size of a golf course development <br /> project to elicit corrective action from a land owner once he or she had failed to respond to a written <br /> notification of violation. Other members suggested that a Stop Work Order (also in Article 23) <br /> would be more effective when a golf course developer is not in compliance with the terms of a <br /> Special Use Permit. <br /> Article 8.7 of the Zoning Ordinance contains provisions for changing a Special Use Permit after <br /> the original approval. Minor changes may be approved by the Zoning Officer, while modifications <br /> that do not meet the ten criteria for minor changes are subject to review at a public hearing before <br /> the Board which approved the original application. The task force was concerned that some of the <br /> criteria used to distinguish a Special Use Permit modification from a minor change would not be <br /> appropriate when applied to a project with the size and complexity of a golf course. <br /> For example, an increase in usable floor area or an increase in the size or number of approved signs <br /> constitutes a modification requiring a public hearing. Given that 1) floor area is not an appropriate <br /> measure of the intensity of a golf course as a land use, and 2)that a golf course typically includes <br /> numerous signs that are not visible from a public road, the current criteria listed in Article 8.7.1 <br /> could be re-evaluated so that changes which are small in proportiori to the use are considered minor <br /> and eligible for administrative review. <br />