Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2 <br /> • modify Flexible Development provisions in the Subdivision Regulations as applied to the District to provide consistency <br /> between the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: None. <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD: None. <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS: <br /> Lee Rafalow, a member of the Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Committee, said that this group's effort could be <br /> used as a model for other Small Area Plans. He complimented Gene Bell on the work that he did with this Committee. He <br /> endorsed the plan in general, but he requested that several areas be reviewed again by the Planning Board along with <br /> several members of the Stoney Creek Committee. He mentioned in particular that there was a concern about the setback <br /> options for the Village Option. Several members felt that the commercial center of the Village Option should be buffered and <br /> set back so as not to be visible from the road. They had come up with recommendations which would encourage that <br /> outcome. <br /> Cheri Rosemond, a resident of the Stoney Creek Basin area, appreciated being notified about this being an agenda <br /> item. She is concerned about the possibility that the Stoney Creek Planning process as well as the regular Flexible <br /> Development Plan process could go forward without notification to the local homeowners. She would very much like to have <br /> homeowners notified when items impacting their neighborhood come before the Planning Board. She also requested <br /> information regarding the 30 acre park that was mentioned as a part of another development. She hoped that if a similar <br /> situation existed in the Stoney Creek Basin the residents would be notified and the County would work with the landowners <br /> about how the park would be developed and used. <br /> County Manger John Link indicated that the Master Plan for Recreation and Parks would be revisited by the Board <br /> of Commissioners in the near future. At that time they will be asked to appoint a committee to review the current plan. A <br /> part of that review would certainly be to include the area residents in discussion and planning. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, Jr., seconded by Commissioner Gordon, to refer the proposed <br /> amendments(C1a, 2b, 3a, &4a)to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of <br /> Commissioners no sooner than April 1, 1997. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 2 Zoning Atlas Amendments <br /> W.l Z-1-97 Car den's B-QjdX and Paint Service <br /> This item was presented by Mary Willis for the purpose of receiving citizen comment on a rezoning <br /> proposal of the Planning Staff to correct an error in the Zoning Atlas. The properties are located on the east side of NC 157 <br /> between Wagoner Dairy Road and Blalock Road. The rezoning involves two contiguous parcels: Tax Map No.1.10..10G at <br /> 7700 NC 157, containing 2.02 acres and owned by Charlie and Jeroline Mangum; and Tax Map No. 1.10..10G at 7709 NC <br /> 157, having 10.97 acres and owned by William H. Carden, Jr. (Carden's Paint and Body Service). <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: None. <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING BOARD: None. <br /> COMMENTS AND/OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS: None. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Carey, Jr.,to refer the <br /> proposed Zoning Atlas amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of <br /> Commissioners no sooner than April 1, 1997. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> Z-2-97 Stoney Creek RaSin Overlay Distri <br /> This item was heard concurrent with Item C1(a). <br /> Zonina Ordinance Text Amendments <br /> j <br /> Stoney Creek Basin Small Area Plan <br /> 1) Article 4.2.32-Stoney Creek Basin Overlay District <br />