Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-16-1997 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 01-16-1997
>
Agenda - 01-16-1997 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2013 9:36:42 AM
Creation date
6/24/2013 9:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/16/1997
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970116
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Related Issues <br /> A letter outlining the concerns and opinions of the attorneys serving Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough, <br /> Orange County and OWASA was presented at the November 6th meeting of the Water and Sewer <br /> Boundary Task Force. The letter made two critical points which may serve to change the course of <br /> major elements of the utility service boundary discussions: 1) land use planning is a legislative function <br /> which cannot be restricted by an agreement other than the joint planning agreements which NC <br /> Legislature has specifically granted the local governments of Orange County the authority to create; and <br /> 2) equity issues cannot by resolved by agreement that restricts the exercise of governmental discretion in <br /> the use of tax funds for a public purpose. After the presentation of the draft review comments from the <br /> town and county attorneys, the task force's discussion of efforts to codify planning and funding equity <br /> issues within the utility service area agreement essentially concluded in confusion. By the end of the <br /> meeting, there was no clear agreement among committee members to either: 1) carry on with a scaled <br /> back process that would simply develop an agreement to delineate utility service area boundaries and <br /> outline utility service provision processes and responsibilities; or 2) carry on with the development of a <br /> boundary agreement while simultaneously addressing planning concerns through joint planning <br /> agreements and equity issues through some other process. <br /> Regardless of the strategy elected officials and policy makers eventually develop to conclude the <br /> boundary agreement process, the discussions-particularly those regarding funding utility construction for <br /> economic development and utility funding equity-have the potential to immediately affect current <br /> County initiatives and policies. One striking example of an immediate impact is the Chapel Hill Town <br /> Board's resolution requesting that Orange County fund $527,000 in sewer improvements within Chapel <br /> Hill. Both the request and the dollar figure are based on the County's 1987-88 funding of a similar <br /> percentage of the costs of constructing the Efland sewer system. This request apparently seeks to ensure <br /> that the citizens, or at least some of the citizens, of Chapel Hill benefit from an "equitable" expenditure <br /> of County dollars for provision of municipal type sewer collection service. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.