Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-16-1997 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1997
>
Agenda - 01-16-1997
>
Agenda - 01-16-1997 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2013 9:36:42 AM
Creation date
6/24/2013 9:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/16/1997
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19970116
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Water and Sewer Boundary Task Force <br /> FROM: Joint Staff Work Group <br /> DATE: October 24, 1996 <br /> RE: Proposed Next Steps for the Draft Boundary Agreement <br /> As part of the September 4 agenda,the joint staffs recommended a stepwise process for <br /> further consideration of the draft boundary agreement. The first step in that process was <br /> executed on September 4, as the draft agreement was conveyed to the attorneys of the <br /> respective jurisdictions for a basic review. <br /> In keeping with the process identified on September 4,the following steps might next be <br /> taken: <br /> • After completion of the basic, legal-issue review by the attorneys, the Task Force <br /> may wish to revise the draft agreement accordingly,providing further direction. <br /> • Next, the Task Force may wish to consider two alternative paths: <br /> 1. Refer to revised draft agreement to the managers and attorneys, asking that <br /> a legal boundary agreement be drawn up for formal consideration by the <br /> elected boards, or <br /> 2. Send the conceptual draft(as it reads)to the elected boards for <br /> comment and review. Following this review period, the Task Force might <br /> meet to consider the comments of the elected boards, and then refer the <br /> draft for drawing into a legal agreement(as in step 1 above). <br /> The first alternative might be most prudent if the Task Force feels comfortable with the <br /> structure of the draft following completion of the November 6 review. This approach <br /> might result in a quicker timeframe for review and possible adoption of a draft <br /> agreement. <br /> The second alternative might be selected if the Task Force prefers to check in with the <br /> respective elected boards about the draft before proceeding to the creation of a formal <br /> agreement. This path would result in a longer timeframe and an additional Task Force <br /> meeting to review elected board comments and make final revisions, but might offer the <br /> benefit of learning of any elected official concerns prior to formal consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.