Orange County NC Website
MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Water and Sewer Boundary Task Force <br /> FROM: Joint Staff Work Group <br /> DATE: October 24, 1996 <br /> RE: Proposed Next Steps for the Draft Boundary Agreement <br /> As part of the September 4 agenda,the joint staffs recommended a stepwise process for <br /> further consideration of the draft boundary agreement. The first step in that process was <br /> executed on September 4, as the draft agreement was conveyed to the attorneys of the <br /> respective jurisdictions for a basic review. <br /> In keeping with the process identified on September 4,the following steps might next be <br /> taken: <br /> • After completion of the basic, legal-issue review by the attorneys, the Task Force <br /> may wish to revise the draft agreement accordingly,providing further direction. <br /> • Next, the Task Force may wish to consider two alternative paths: <br /> 1. Refer to revised draft agreement to the managers and attorneys, asking that <br /> a legal boundary agreement be drawn up for formal consideration by the <br /> elected boards, or <br /> 2. Send the conceptual draft(as it reads)to the elected boards for <br /> comment and review. Following this review period, the Task Force might <br /> meet to consider the comments of the elected boards, and then refer the <br /> draft for drawing into a legal agreement(as in step 1 above). <br /> The first alternative might be most prudent if the Task Force feels comfortable with the <br /> structure of the draft following completion of the November 6 review. This approach <br /> might result in a quicker timeframe for review and possible adoption of a draft <br /> agreement. <br /> The second alternative might be selected if the Task Force prefers to check in with the <br /> respective elected boards about the draft before proceeding to the creation of a formal <br /> agreement. This path would result in a longer timeframe and an additional Task Force <br /> meeting to review elected board comments and make final revisions, but might offer the <br /> benefit of learning of any elected official concerns prior to formal consideration. <br />