Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-18-2013 - 7e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 06-18-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-18-2013 - 7e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2015 9:51:25 AM
Creation date
6/17/2013 10:07:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/18/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7e
Document Relationships
2013-195 AMS - MBAJ Architects Inc for NHSC Architrectural and Engineering Design/Construction $173,500
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2013
Minutes 06-18-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
103 <br />Northern Human Services Center <br />The following information was gathered from attendees at the Northern Human <br />Services Center Public Input Sessions, held on March 19, 2012 at 5:00 and again at <br />6:00 pm in the cafeteria of the Center. <br />The format of the meeting was as follows: <br />• Staff Overview of Purpose of Sessions <br />• Status of Current Structure, Limitations and Costs <br />• Overview of "survey" and "dot- voting" exercises' <br />• Review of survey questions, community thoughts and ideas <br />• Closing remarks, next steps, website progress reports <br />• Survey turn -in, dot- voting <br />• Adjourn (repeated at 6:10 pm)2 <br />Future Facility Questions ("Survey") <br />At the public information session, attendees were given a list of questions and <br />asked to vote yes /no. Of the estimated 52 attendees, around 29 submitted <br />responses. <br />Mixed Opinions <br />1. The attendees seemed to have a mixed opinion between two options: <br />a. Deconstructing /demolishing the current 1952 building, with <br />appropriate "memorialization," and construction of a new facility; or <br />b. Retaining the middle portion of the existing facility (cafeteria and <br />gymnasium), and retrofitting and building new facilities (restrooms, <br />etc) around this. <br />Strong Opinions (greater than 3:1) <br />1. If a new building, it should be an enclosed facility and not an open "shelter "; <br />2. If new, it should be located near the current location (front) of property; <br />3. If new, the old building should be memorialized in some way (plaques, <br />retain a wall or some portion of the old structure, photo exhibit, etc) <br />4. Locating a cell tower on the property would be okay, if improved reception <br />1 It should be noted that some meeting attendees objected to filling out a survey or "voting" <br />at the meeting, and expressed a desire for 1) more information and 2) the ability to submit <br />surveys at a later date. Surveys were agreed to be accepted later, however only one such <br />survey was received. <br />2 Only four persons attended the 6:10 session, which followed the 5:00 format but became <br />more of a question and answer session. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.