Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-18-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 06-18-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-18-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 4:43:45 PM
Creation date
6/17/2013 8:51:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/18/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-18-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> 1 their residents of any change. He said their attorneys may disagree on the notice and say it is <br /> 2 the County's responsibility. <br /> 3 Commissioner Dorosin said this resolution, as worded, would not support the authority. <br /> 4 He recommended that wording on the authority be added. He said that without it the towns are <br /> 5 not being given a chance for input, as the decision has been made. He feels the Board should <br /> 6 get the towns' feedback on both. <br /> 7 Commissioner Pelissier agreed with Commissioner Dorosin. She said it should be <br /> 8 designated that the tax district needs to be enacted as a temporary measure. She said time <br /> 9 may be needed to determine if people want a Solid Waste Authority. She feels the wording <br /> 10 really needs to be fleshed out. <br /> 11 She said she is not sure what role residents would play if a tax district is implemented. <br /> 12 She said that it is really up to elected officials to determine tax rates, and involving anyone other <br /> 13 than staff and elected officials to the work group may slow this option down. <br /> 14 Chair Jacobs said he was thinking that the tax rate would be determined in 2013-14. <br /> 15 Commissioner Rich said she likes the idea of including the authority, but that idea needs <br /> 16 to be fleshed out. She feels the tax district should be put in place first with an option of an <br /> 17 authority down the road. <br /> 18 Chair Jacobs said he was trying to structure this resolution to focus on the tax district for <br /> 19 this coming year and then a longer term resolution and a working group for coming back with a <br /> 20 recommendation for the next year. He is not in favor of an authority because he feels that more <br /> 21 bureaucracy and distance from elected officials is a bad idea. <br /> 22 Commissioner Dorosin asked about the idea of a short term and long term solution. He <br /> 23 said he thought there was already a short term solution through funding through fiscal year <br /> 24 2013. He asked for clarification on whether the goal is to get this tax district in place through <br /> 25 July 1 of this year. <br /> 26 Chair Jacobs said the goal would be to at least have a frame work in which to proceed. <br /> 27 He said he has heard the point that this may preclude having a similar discussion about an <br /> 28 authority. He said it could be either/or since there is a band aid solution for the next year. <br /> 29 Frank Clifton said there are some parameters and impacts of these decisions. He <br /> 30 reviewed franchise options and the proposal to use reserve funds to cover short term costs. He <br /> 31 said that the County, in the end, is responsible through general funds to fill gaps in revenues for <br /> 32 all of its operations. He said the convenience centers are already subsidized by general funds. <br /> 33 He said the most difficult aspect is to assess the estimated tax rate for the district to operate as <br /> 34 it does now. He reviewed some of the cost analysis that will be involved. He said that in <br /> 35 narrowing down the area being served, there will be a higher impact on the tax rate for those <br /> 36 individuals. He said these numbers will be worked on. He feels Chair Jacobs motion is <br /> 37 adequate in addressing general parameters and gives a basis to move forward. He said that if <br /> 38 reserves are used, those funds must be replaced at some point. <br /> 39 Commissioner Gordon said that in trying to figure out how to add the appropriate <br /> 40 language, she recommends that, in addition to her earlier suggestion, something be added to <br /> 41 the resolution paragraphs regarding cost estimates. <br /> 42 She noted that this resolution is being discussed right after a public hearing and that <br /> 43 anything passed tonight should state that it is the Board's "intent" to pass this resolution. This <br /> 44 can be followed by input from the towns and others before coming back to pass it. <br /> 45 Commissioner Price said that it looks as if the resolution is trying to incorporate two <br /> 46 steps. She said that in one of these, a decision must be made in the next couple of weeks. <br /> 47 She said that the language about working with the towns, residents and business owners <br /> 48 regarding a solid waste authority, needs to be in step two of the resolution. <br /> 49 Chair Jacobs suggested that the motion be simplified to include the 5 point bare bones <br /> 50 actions to authorize and direct for future actions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.