Agenda - 06-18-2013 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

12 1 rejection of any option to eliminate curbside recycling and she feels this is an option to improve 2 the program. 3 Emily Burrough lives in Hillsborough and is concerned that if curbside becomes optional 4 many will opt out of recycling. She suggested, if the Board does make curbside recycling 5 optional, then recyclable items could be banned from the waste stream. She said this could just 6 be an extension of the corrugated cardboard ban. 7 8 End of Public Comment 9 10 Chair Jacobs noted that several questions were raised during the public comment. He 11 said the county legislative delegation did try to get authority but it died in committee. 12 John Roberts, referring to a question regarding Chapel Hill residents in Durham County, 13 said, without an inter-local agreement with Chapel Hill, Orange County has no legal authority to 14 provide a service and charge a fee outside of its jurisdiction. He said it would be up to the town 15 of Chapel Hill to ask Orange County to serve this area and to authorize the county to do so. 16 Frank Clifton said the county would not have the authority to levy a fee, so the 17 agreement with Chapel Hill would have to include a methodology of the town applying a tax and 18 paying the County. 19 Chair Jacobs said two people asked about getting with staff to talk about small haulers 20 using the convenience centers as an alternative to disposing in Durham. He asked the 21 manager and Gayle Wilson to meet with small haulers and report back to Board of County 22 Commissioners on pros and cons of this arrangement. 23 Commissioner McKee asked for clarification as to what happens to everything except 24 the $37 base fee from this point moving forward. He said his understanding that these fees will 25 go away and the tax will replace them. 26 Frank Clifton said fees for facilities and county wide services are appropriate; fees for 27 services at curbside and multi-family locations are not within the county jurisdiction. He said the 28 County could create a system of opting in or out for some services, but this would require 29 creation of a billing system. He said there is an issue with the fact that if there is a 30 neighborhood of 15 houses and only 4 opt in, the cost of the service will remain the same. He 31 said that in rural neighborhoods, often one neighbor will pay the cost and everyone shares cost 32 and shares the cans. He said these are examples of a number of issues that exist. 33 John Roberts said the Supreme Court decision suggested that Orange County does not 34 have the authority and he read it as a need for the county to look at other options. 35 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that the County currently collects multi-family and 36 government facility waste inside the towns. He asked if whatever option is chosen, going 37 forward, would require those facilities to be part of this. 38 Frank Clifton said Orange County has contracts with schools and their own facilities but 39 multi-family units would require the town to take action. 40 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that a tax district would be funded with a tax, but the 41 authority would be funded by fees. 42 Frank Clifton said this would be one methodology, but there are several options. 43 Commissioner Dorosin asked if those fees would be levied on everyone who is subject 44 to that authority. 45 Frank Clifton said the authority can provide services and charge fees accordingly. He 46 said, if the service is not provided, the fee won't be levied. 47 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the fee is based on the service being available or based 48 on the service being used. 49 Frank Clifton said it will be the first choice.