Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
0 S 6 <br /> Mr. Belk <br /> March 27, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> recent nominations usually need some updating and expanding. We <br /> have the following suggestions: <br /> All four reports: <br /> It is very important to describe and justify the boundary of <br /> a proposed landmark. Each report needs to be strengthened <br /> in this regard. To each report, add a property map with the <br /> exact boundary of the proposed landmark clearly marked. <br /> Cite the tax map, block, and lot numbers. Add a statement <br /> of the exact acreage. If the boundary is different from the <br /> National Register nomination, explain and justify the <br /> difference. <br /> Many numbered highways and roads have been given proper <br /> names since early National Register nominations were <br /> written. Please give the property's current address in <br /> addition to that given on the nomination. <br /> Give the name and mailing address of the current owner. <br /> Chatwood• <br /> The historical name of this property is Faucett Mill and <br /> House, and it is actually listed in the National Register as <br /> a district because of the variety of the resources and the <br /> fact that the mill tract and the house tract comprised two <br /> separate parcels, each having a different owner, at the time <br /> of the nomination in 1988. It is unclear to us whether both <br /> tracts are intended to be included in the proposed landmark. <br /> If they are still under different ownership, they should be <br /> designated as two separate landmarks. If the two tracts <br /> have now been consolidated under one owner, a single <br /> landmark is appropriate. If only the house tract, and not <br /> the mill tract, is proposed for designation, this should be <br /> stated in the cover memo. - Whatever the case, the memo <br /> should address and clarify the matter. <br /> Although the National Register nomination does not include <br /> archaeological resources, they may very well be present. <br /> The mill and surroundings would be of greater concern, but <br /> we are not sure this area is included in the proposed <br /> designation. In any case, mention should be made of the <br /> potential for archaeological resources. <br /> State the current use. <br /> Include current photographs of all the buildings within the <br /> proposed landmark boundaries. <br />