Orange County NC Website
2 <br /> were made to invite officials from the City of Mebane in the event the City would like to <br /> participate in this project. However, they did not respond to County staff. <br /> The objectives of the work group were to: <br /> 1. Create a unified ordinance. The group's work practice has essentially been to-compare <br /> the same or similar sections of the three existing ordinances and decide which made-the <br /> most sense in light of experience providing_ effective animal services in the different <br /> jurisdictions. The County's current Animal Control Ordinance remains the backbone for <br /> the proposed unified ordinance. In addition, the comparative methodology assured a <br /> finished product that was complete, strong and worthy -of designation as a unified <br /> ordinance for the County. <br /> 2. Fill in necessary "paps" in the Ordinance to create the needed authority to assure the <br /> public health and safety and welfare of animals within Orange County. One illustration of <br /> such authority would be to have an animal euthanized for humane reasons in exigent <br /> circumstances. Another illustration would be the authority to hold a vicious animal that <br /> has repeatedly bitten or attacked members of the public. <br /> While there may well be a need for new laws under the animal-control ordinance, staff did not <br /> make any effort to create new laws but deferred such efforts until it could occur under a unified <br /> ordinance. Throughout the process requests to create new law were resisted to ensure there <br /> was no "scope creep". Staff attempted to- propose changes to the existing Ordinances that <br /> would n-ot be controversial, refined -existing services being provided, and assured the public <br /> health and the safety of animals. <br /> During the initial process, the existence of"gaps" in the existing ordinances-become apparent in <br /> trying to address and resolves the concerns of residents in different parts of Orange County. <br /> Staff has tried to work around the gaps in the Ordinance in close collaboration with staff <br /> attorneys from the County and municipalities to respond to animal control issues and to protect <br /> public safety and the welfare of the animals. <br /> In addition to Staff review of the Ordinance changes, the Animal Services Advisory Board <br /> ("ASAB") also reviewed and suggested changes to the draft Unified Ordinance. The ASAB <br /> discussed the proposed changes to the Ordinance on three occasions: <br /> • At the initial meeting (February 20, 2013), the Animal Services staff attorney discussed <br /> the effort to create a unified ordinance, its rationale and its scope. <br /> • In a subsequent meeting (March 20 2013), the Animal Services Director and staff <br /> attorney went through a draft version of the proposed ordinance distributed in advance of <br /> the meeting for review by board members. This was a page-by-page review in which <br /> feedback was provided for additional consideration. <br /> • At the May 15, 2013 ASAB meeting, the focus was on the status of vicious animals in the <br /> proposed unified ordinance. The Animal Services Director presented a summary to <br /> identify the "gaps" that were being in-filled by the proposed ordinance as well as the logic <br /> of state and local laws and their articulation and limitations. At the meeting the ASAB <br /> made some suggestions for further consideration (which staff has incorporated) and <br /> unanimously recommended that staff bring its effort to create the unified ordinance to <br /> completion as soon as possible. <br />