Browse
Search
RES-1999-066 Resolution to Deny Woodgreen Subdivision Preliminary Plat
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Resolutions
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
RES-1999-066 Resolution to Deny Woodgreen Subdivision Preliminary Plat
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2013 4:27:33 PM
Creation date
6/3/2013 11:17:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/5/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Resolution
Agenda Item
9f
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-05-1999 - 9f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 10-05-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 o h-r-mcNM�N% z <br /> RESOLUTION <br /> OF THE <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br /> TO DENY <br /> WOODGREEN SUBDIVISION PRELIMIINARY PLAT <br /> Date October 5,1999 <br /> Name of Subdivision Woodgreen Subdivision <br /> Owner/Applicant Tri-Star Brokerage&Development,Inc. <br /> Dennis Evans,Mike Barr <br /> The Board of County Commissioners hereby denies approval of Woodgreen subdivision for twenty-five (25) <br /> residential lots as shown on the preliminary plat, dated February 9, 1998, and last revised December 29, 1998, as <br /> further revised with identification of septic system type received on or about August 16, 1999, and screening <br /> diagram received on or about April 26, 1999,based on the following. <br /> 1. The development does not provide the minimum 33% open space required in Flexible Development <br /> since the applicant has not demonstrated that the land use buffers proposed along Moorefields Road and <br /> along the north boundary and a portion of the east boundary"screen the view of[the] development and <br /> preserve the character of the rural public roads"as required to satisfy criteria for Secondary Open Space. <br /> Therefore,those.buffers may not count toward meeting the minimum open space requirement in Flexible <br /> Development.A sketch and area calculations demonstrating this are attached to this Resolution and <br /> Made a part of it. <br /> 2. The submitted landscape plan does not provide the following items needed to meet requirements of Orange <br /> County Subdivision Regulations Section IV-B-8-b: <br /> a) designation of tree protection areas accompanied by a note stating, "Existing trees will be preserved to meet <br /> the landscape requirements of Section IV-B-8-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations." The <br /> only tree protection areas shown on the plat are within the 100 year flood plain and the adjacent stream <br /> buffer.No other tree protection areas are indicated.There is nothing on the landscape plan stating that or <br /> showing how existing trees will be preserved. <br /> b) the location of berms, walls, and fences with an indication of their height and construction materials: the <br /> plat indicates a "220' area of open space to have a planted 6' high berm and the applicant(s) submitted a <br /> separate diagram(Alternative Screening Along Moorefields Road To Be Used Instead of Berm)that <br /> shows two 30'sections of fencing and gives lengths and depth of fencing but does not indicate height nor <br /> fencing materials.A letter,dated June 3, 1999, from the applicant(s) attorney states that the"clients plan to <br /> have wooden fencing along the two entrances off of Moorefields Road,and similar fencing at the corner of <br /> Dimmocks Mill Road and running the entire length of Dimmocks Mill Road.However,none of the <br /> proposed fencing shown contains sufficient specifications to demonstrate necessary requirements of the <br /> landscape plan are met. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.