Orange County NC Website
were made to invite officials from the City of Mebane in the event the City would like to <br />participate in this project. However, they did not respond to County staff. <br />The objectives of the work group were to- <br />1 . Create a unified ordinance. The group's work practice has essentially been to compare <br />the same or similar sections of the three existing ordinances and decide which made the <br />most sense in light of experience providing effective animal services in the different <br />jurisdictions. The County's current Animal Control Ordinance remains the backbone for <br />the proposed unified ordinance. In addition, the comparative methodology assured a <br />finished product that was complete, strong and worthy of designation as a unified <br />ordinance for the County. <br />2. Fill in necessary "gaps" in the Ordinance to create the needed authority to assure the <br />public health and safety and welfare of animals within Orange County. One illustration of <br />such authority would be to have an animal euthanized for humane reasons in exigent <br />circumstances. Another illustration would be the authority to hold a vicious animal that <br />has repeatedly bitten or attacked members of the public. <br />While there may well be a need for new laws under the animal control ordinance, staff did not <br />make any effort to create new laws but deferred such efforts until it could occur under a unified <br />ordinance. Throughout the process requests to create new law were resisted to ensure there <br />was no "scope creep ". Staff attempted to propose changes to the existing Ordinances that <br />would not be controversial, refined existing services being provided, and assured the public <br />health and the safety of animals. <br />During the initial process, the existence of "gaps" in the existing ordinances become apparent in <br />trying to address and resolves the concerns of residents in different parts of Orange County. <br />Staff has tried to work around the gaps in the Ordinance in close collaboration with staff <br />attorneys from the County and municipalities to respond to animal control issues and to protect <br />public safety and the welfare of the animals. <br />In addition to Staff review of the Ordinance changes, the Animal Services Advisory Board <br />( "ASAB ") also reviewed and suggested changes to the draft Unified Ordinance. The ASAB <br />discussed the proposed changes to the Ordinance on three occasions: <br />• At the initial meeting (February 20, 2013), the Animal Services staff attorney discussed <br />the effort to create a unified ordinance, its rationale and its scope. <br />• In a subsequent meeting (March 20 2013), the Animal Services Director and staff <br />attorney went through a draft version of the proposed ordinance distributed in advance of <br />the meeting for review by board members. This was a page -by -page review in which <br />feedback was provided for additional consideration. <br />• At the May 15, 2013 ASAB meeting, the focus was on the status of vicious animals in the <br />proposed unified ordinance. The Animal Services Director presented a summary to <br />identify the "gaps" that were being in- filled by the proposed ordinance as well as the logic <br />of state and local laws and their articulation and limitations. At the meeting the ASAB <br />made some suggestions for further consideration (which staff has incorporated) and <br />unanimously recommended that staff bring its effort to create the unified ordinance to <br />completion as soon as possible. <br />