Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
47 <br /> 1 Mr. Benedict indicated that he would return in the fall with those recommendations. He <br /> 2 will research this issue and solicit input from the public and developers. Also, they will take <br /> 3 various properties and put them through the processes that they will be suggesting prior to <br /> 4 presenting them to the Board of County Commissioners. The soil suitability analysis and <br /> 5 minimum lot size will be carefully reviewed. They will hopefully return with standards that would <br /> 6 be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in such a way that developers would <br /> 7 actually use them. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Commissioner Brown stated that if Flexible Development is implemented in such a way <br /> 10 that it achieves the goal of rural character and preservation of open space, she would want to <br /> 11 see it become the development option for the county. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Chair Gordon referred to Section F, Evaluation Criteria and asked how it would be <br /> 14 decided which goal would be pursued. For example, under forestland in Natural Areas, the goal <br /> 15 is to preserve forestland and within farmland conservation the goal is to preserve farmland. <br /> 16 She pointed out that with forestland preservation the development would be in the open space. <br /> 17 However, in farmland preservation, the development would be in the forest area. The question <br /> 18 is, does the staff complete an analysis and then steer the developer? <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Mr. Benedict stated that Dave Stancil's area is developing maps will be used by the . <br /> 21 planning staff to identify conservation areas. For example, developers will be made aware of <br /> 22 where wildlife conservation corridors, etc., are located. When developers initially approach the <br /> 23 Planning Department, they will be made aware of all areas of importance which will need to be <br /> 24 given consideration. To date, a prioritization for environmentally sensitive areas has been <br /> 25 developed. What they have not yet developed is a comparison between the areas and a <br /> 26 ranking of what is more important. That comparison will guide the decision when there are <br /> 27 conflicting areas to be preserved. That ranking system will include items such as "how rare is <br /> 28 the resource in the county, is it in the path of development, and what is the integrity of the <br /> 29 resource" <br /> 30 <br /> 31 A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Brown, to <br /> 32 refer the proposed amendments to Article 22, Definitions, of the Orange County Zoning <br /> 33 Ordinance and to Section IV-B-10, Flexible Development, of the Orange County Subdivision <br /> 34 Regulations to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of County <br /> 35 Commissioners no sooner than August 17, 1999. <br /> 36 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 37 <br /> 38 ADJOURNMENT: <br /> 39 A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs, to <br /> 40 adjourn the meeting. The next regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners will be held on <br /> 41 May 27,1999 in the F. Gordon Battle Courtroom, Old Court House, Hillsborough, North <br /> 42 Carolina. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Alice M. Gordon, Chair <br /> 45 Kathy Baker, Deputy Clerk <br /> 46 <br />