Browse
Search
Minutes 04-11-2013
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Minutes 04-11-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2013 9:34:05 AM
Creation date
5/22/2013 8:54:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/11/2013
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-11-2013 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 04-11-2013 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-11-2013 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 04-11-2013 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-11-2013 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 04-11-2013 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-11-2013 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2013\Agenda - 04-11-2013 - Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frank Clifton said Durham Tech is the primary component in industrial business <br /> recruitment from a training perspective. He said Durham Tech has worked closely with <br /> Economic Development Director Steve Brantley in reference to industrial business recruitment. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin made reference to the last page of the handout in the packet <br /> about funding needs and the last bullet point regarding a 2% increase for salary for security <br /> and maintenance. He asked if the positions funded by the County were being paid sufficiently <br /> and if the 2% increase should be given regardless of whether the State funding happens or <br /> not. <br /> Dr. Ingram said the employees are Durham Tech employees regardless of the source <br /> of funding. He said they try not to draw distinction among them as it relates to the funding of <br /> salaries. He said most of the employees funded by county funds are <br /> technical/paraprofessional in nature. He said they need to have funds to pay for the inequities <br /> that arise and they are mindful of these situations. <br /> 2. Employee Benefits Update, Preliminary Renewal Estimates Regarding Calendar <br /> Year 2014 Health Insurance, and Anticipated Health Care Reform Components <br /> Human Resources Director Nicole Clark and Mark Browder from Mark III made a <br /> PowerPoint presentation. <br /> Health insurance update <br /> 2013 Enrollment Highlights and 2012 Plan Performance/2014 Plan Year Preliminary <br /> Recommendations <br /> April 11, 2013 Work Session <br /> 2012 Summary <br /> - Year one with United Healthcare <br /> - Initial dissatisfaction with change in provider and plan structure <br /> - 2013 Plan design recommendations addressed concerns <br /> - Renewal cost less than projections <br /> - Enrollment process successful, no significant complaints <br /> Health Insurance Enrollment Comparison (chart) <br /> Optional Benefits <br /> New Enrollment Comparison (chart) <br /> Benefits Activities and Programs <br /> - ERC Meeting updates <br /> - Town Hall Meeting (December) <br /> - Health and Wellness website demonstration (January) <br /> - Know Your Numbers (February) <br /> - Health Care Cost Estimator (March) <br /> Health Insurance RFP Timeline <br /> th <br /> April 15 RFP solicitation published <br /> ,d <br /> May 3 Response deadline <br /> st <br /> May 31 Evaluations complete <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.