Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
b. Want a system that maximizes recycling; <br /> c. Want a system that maximizes equity; <br /> d. Want a system that is fair to staff and private haulers; <br /> e. Want a system that advances the possibility of comprehensive waste <br /> reduction in partnership with the towns. <br /> 2. Consider options 2, 37 4 permutated into one option; consider option 1 for a solid <br /> waste authority for either a long term or alternative option; and leave on the table <br /> option 8 that would have a 3-R fee with no curbside recycling. <br /> 3. Hold a public hearing on April 23 where the three options will be presented. <br /> 4. Notify haulers that the Board is removing from options under consideration the <br /> franchising system. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> c. Performance Evaluation Process for Three Staff Members Appointed by the Board — <br /> County Attorney, Clerk, and Manager <br /> The Board reviewed and considered approval of the performance evaluation process <br /> for three staff members appointed by the Board — County Attorney, Clerk to the Board and <br /> Manager, including proposed scopes of work. <br /> Attachment 1 is the Employee Evaluation Process for the County Attorney and Clerk to the <br /> Board, which includes the a) Process Prior to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) <br /> Evaluation Meeting; b) the actual process during and after the BOCC Evaluation Meeting (Closed <br /> Session); c) Employee's Work Plan/Goals; and d) Employee's Current Salary and Status. <br /> At the March 12, 2013 work session, the Board of Commissioners discussed informally <br /> an evaluation process for the three staff members who are appointed by the Board. The <br /> Board's direction from that work session was for the sub-committee (Commissioner Renee <br /> Price, Commissioner Penny Rich and Clerk to the Board Donna Baker) to bring back a revised <br /> Performance Evaluation Process for the Clerk to the Board and the County Attorney, along <br /> with examples of evaluation forms for the Board to review; and to bring back a proposed scope <br /> of work for facilitating the County Manager's performance evaluation process with the use of a <br /> consultant with a funding option not to exceed $3,300. <br /> The proposed project goals for the evaluation process are: <br /> ❑ Provide County Attorney, Clerk, and Manager with feedback on her/his performance, <br /> identifying strengths and areas for improvement <br /> ❑ Foster effective communication and strengthen working relationship between Board of <br /> Commissioners and County Attorney, Clerk, and Manager <br /> ❑ Link performance evaluation to decision about compensation for coming year <br /> There is a financial impact of up to $3,300 associated with the County Manager's <br /> performance evaluation process. Funding would come from the Clerk to the Board's annual <br /> budget. <br />