Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 2:37:41 PM
Creation date
5/20/2013 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-21-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> 1 backdoor service to elderly and disabled oustonners, as well as recycling at no ex ra charge. <br /> 2 She said that a waste franchise would have a negative impact on those s ia| needs <br /> 3 residents. She said that option 6 seems to provide the best opportunity for businesses like <br /> 4 hers to remain in business. She said the second issue is the alternative dumping options due <br /> 5 to the closing of the Orange County Landfill. She said that the only current option is to <br /> 6 transport the trash to Durham,which is a 50 mile round trip and doubled dumping fees. She <br /> 7 said that all other surrounding counties and landfills have denied use of their facilities. She said- <br /> 8 thmt, being a small company, these private businesses transport less than one ton of recycling <br /> 9- or trash per trip and with the increased ratea, mileage and time, will soon be out of business. <br /> 10 She proposed that small, registered trash companies be allowed to dump at the convenience <br /> 11 centers with a special permit and a flat rate pay system that is currently in use at the landfill. <br /> 12 She said that this would include only companies that hand unload and separate trash and <br /> 13 recycling. She said that a pay as you throw system might benefit individuals, but it would more <br /> 14 than double small company fees. She said that this proposal would allow Orange County to <br /> 15 continue collecting a portion of the revenues lost at the closing of the landfill. She said that her <br /> 10 company alone paid over$7,000 in dumping fees. She said it would also support local <br /> 17 business and local economy. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Bonnie Hauser, Orange County Voice, read the following: <br /> 20 We studied the rural curbside recycling 5 years ago. At the time, the county wanted to <br /> 21 close convenience centers and introduce waste franchises. We surveyed the trash and <br /> 22 recycling habits of rural households. Dr Karl Hoffman, demographer, led our team—and we <br /> 23 had 881 responses from households throughout the county north and west of Chapel Hill. <br /> 24 Based on our survey responses, 85%of rural residents recycle regu|edy. 60%compost yard <br /> 25 waste, 48% compost kitchen waste. Given trends in composdng, those numbers could be <br /> 26 higher now. <br /> 27 First some basics- The County's five convenience centers are the county's most <br /> 28 important recycling service. The county's website reports that over 40% of the residential <br /> 29 recyclables go to convenience centers and drop sites. That is over 5000 tons a year. The rural <br /> 30 curbside recycling program is much smaller—about 15%. or just over 1800 tons a year. <br /> 31 Today the county provides rural curbside recycling to roughly 13,500 rural households. <br /> 32 Thousands of those households DO NOT USE THE SERVICE TODAY. They already opt out. <br /> 33 Our survey, which was consistent with the county's own dsta, suggested that about 40%of the <br /> 34 13,500 households opted out. That's about 5000 families. <br /> 35 Our survey asked why. Most respondents (about 80%) said it was easier to take their <br /> 36 recyclables to the convenience centers when they took their trash. Others mentioned service <br /> 37 issuea, mostly access to their home and frequency of service. <br /> 38 You may want to verify with the county, but we're guessing that thousands of families <br /> 39 still opt out of rural curbside recycling. Since our waste reduction rates are at an all time high, <br /> 40 there is no evidence that"opting out" has adversely impacted recycling rates in any way. <br /> 41 There is an issue of fees. According to UNC's School of Gowernnnent, the county is <br /> 42 legally required to allow households to"opt out"of paying the curbside collection fee of$38 a <br /> 43 year. We can't say how many people would opt out of the fee or how that impacts the <br /> 44 economics of the program. In the interests of transparency, we hope you'll explore those <br /> 45 economics further. <br /> 46 We realize that the county is facing difficult economic issues with all aspects of trash <br /> 47 and recycling. One thing is nertain, rural residents care about recycling; and even though <br /> 48 thousands already opt out of rural curbside recycling pnogranm, they recycle heavily and <br /> 49 contribution to county's waste reduction results. <br /> 50 Thank you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.