Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-21-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 2:37:41 PM
Creation date
5/20/2013 10:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/21/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-21-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> 1 • Solid Waste Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures <br /> 2 • Solid Waste Advisory Board Resolution <br /> 3 • Summary of Solid Waste and Recycling Service <br /> 4 • Information from Commission for the Envinznnnont(CfE) <br /> 5 • Information from Town of Hilisborough <br /> 6 • Letter from Recycling Employees <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Michael Talbert said Orange County is recognized as being number one in the state for waste <br /> 9 reduction, reaching 59% of its 61% aggressive reduction goal. The County is disposing only <br /> 10 0.56 tons/person compared to the base year of 1991-92, when the disposal rate measured 1.36 <br /> 11 tons. In the region, Wake County has achieved a 25% reduction rate, Durham County rate is at <br /> 12 21%, Chatham County is at 37%and Alamance County at 26%. Orange County's 61%waste <br /> 13 reduction goal was adopted in 1997 by the County and by the Towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill <br /> 14 and Hillsborough as part of the County's original Comprehensive Solid Waste Plan. The <br /> 15 County is committed to continuous robust public education services and waste reduction <br /> 16 programs regardless of the funding or operational program implemented by the Board. <br /> 17 The County's Reduce, Reuse & Recycle (3-R) Fees consists of four annual recycling <br /> 18 fees adopted by Orange County in 2004 to fund recycling programs and services that are billed <br /> 19 in co junction with the annual property tax. The fee consists of a Basic Fee ($37/year) that is <br /> 20 charged to all improved properties county-wide and funds various recycling operations such as <br /> 21 the county To)dcity Reduction Improvement Program (Household Hazardous Waste, batteries, <br /> 22 waste oil, e\ectrnnics, otc.), reoyc|ingdrop'oYfa)tes' recycling at solid waste convenience <br /> 23 centers, education and outreach, enforcement, planning, etc. An Urban Curbside Fee <br /> 24 ($52/year) is assessed to improved residential properties within incorporated municipalities and <br /> 25 funds weekly curbside recycling service. <br /> 26 A Rural Curbside Fee ($38/ r) is charged to residential property in areas of <br /> 27 unincorporated Orange County eligible to receive bi-weekly curbside recycling service. Finally, <br /> 28 a Multi-family Fee ($19/year) is charged multi-family units throughout Orange County for multi- <br /> 29 family recycling services. (Attachment 4, Solid Waste Recycling Division Schedule of Revenues <br /> 30 and Expenses for Fiscal 2011/2012. Not related to recycling, the County also assesses a <br /> 31 county-wide Solid Waste Convenience Center Fee that is billed in conjunction with the annual <br /> 32 property tax. <br /> 33 The Unincorporated Areas Fee is ($ r/H h |d)' |noorpomdadAreasFeeia <br /> 34 ($10/vear/Houaeho|d), and Multi-family Fee is ($2/year/multi-family unit). This basic Solid <br /> 35 Waste Convenience Center Fee covers a portion of the operating costs of the County's five (5) <br /> 36 Convenience Centers. <br /> 37 A recent court decision, Lanvale v Cabarrus County, essentially says that where there is <br /> 38 no direct statutory authority to levy a fee, a local government cannot levy a fee. Since the <br /> 39 Lanvale opinion was issued, Orange County's staff has been engaged in discussions regarding <br /> 40 how, going forward, the County can best address the issues created by this action of the <br /> 41 Supreme Court. The Basic Fee is likely consistent with existing law, but the Urban, Rural and <br /> 42 Multi-family recycling fees may not be consistent with existing case law. The County Manager <br /> 43 will recommend that the Board of County Commissioners cease assessing the Urban, Rural <br /> 44 and Multi-family recycling fees beginning with the Fiscal 2013/14 Annual Budget. <br /> 45 The County Manager further recommends funding these services for Fiscal 2013/14 <br /> 46 only with solid waste enterprise fund reserves to allow the County time to transition to an <br /> 47 alternative solution. The Rural Curbside program currently is limited to 13,730 households <br /> 48 eligible in the unincorporated area of the County. A rural curbside recycling fee is charged to <br /> 49 those households where recycling services are made available. These services are provided by <br /> 50 County Staff. Just 6,000 households lack access to rural curbside service at this time and are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.