Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 05-14-2013 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 2:26:04 PM
Creation date
5/10/2013 7:58:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/14/2013
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-14-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />procedures. No vote greater than a majority vote shall be required for the board of county <br />commissioners or planning board to issue such permits. For the purposes of this section, vacant <br />positions on the board and members who are disqualified from voting on a quasi - judicial matter shall <br />not be considered "members of the board" for calculation of the requisite majority. Every such decision <br />of the board of county commissioners or planning board shall be subject to review of the superior court <br />in the nature of certiorari consistent with G.S. 153A -345. <br />(d) A county may regulate the development over estuarine waters and over lands covered by <br />navigable waters owned by the State pursuant to G.S. 146 -12, within the bounds of that county. <br />(e) For the purpose of this section, the term "structures" shall include floating homes. <br />(f) Repealed by Session Laws 2005 -426, s. 5(b), effective January 1, 2006. <br />(g) A member of the board of county commissioners shall not vote on any zoning map or text <br />amendment where the outcome of the matter being considered is reasonably likely to have a direct, <br />substantial, and readily identifiable financial impact on the member. Members of appointed boards <br />providing advice to the board of county commissioners shall not vote on recommendations regarding <br />any zoning map or text amendment where the outcome of the matter being considered is reasonably <br />likely to have a direct, substantial, and readily identifiable financial impact on the member. <br />(h) As provided in this subsection, counties may adopt temporary moratoria on any county <br />development approval required by law. county development approval required by law, except for the <br />purpose of developing and adopting new or amended plans or ordinances as to residential uses. The <br />duration of any moratorium shall be reasonable in light of the specific conditions that warrant <br />imposition of the moratorium and may not exceed the period of time necessary to correct, modify, or <br />resolve such conditions. Except in cases of imminent and substantial threat to public health or safety, <br />before adopting an ordinance imposing a development moratorium with a duration of 60 days or any <br />shorter period, the board of commissioners shall hold a public hearing and shall publish a notice of the <br />hearing in a newspaper having general circulation in the area not less than seven days before the date <br />set for the hearing. A development moratorium with a duration of 61 days or longer, and any extension <br />of a moratorium so that the total duration is 61 days or longer, is subject to the notice and hearing <br />requirements of G.S. 153A -323. Absent an imminent threat to public health or safety, a development <br />moratorium adopted pursuant to this section shall not apply to any project for which a valid building <br />permit issued pursuant to G.S. 153A -357 is outstanding, to any project for which a conditional use <br />permit application or special use permit application has been accepted, to development set forth in a <br />site - specific or phased development plan approved pursuant to G.S. 153A- 344.1, to development for <br />which substantial expenditures have already been made in good faith reliance on a prior valid <br />administrative or quasi - judicial permit or approval, or to preliminary or final subdivision plats that have <br />been accepted for review by the county prior to the call for public hearing to adopt the moratorium. Any <br />preliminary subdivision plat accepted for review by the county prior to the call for public hearing, if <br />subsequently approved, shall be allowed to proceed to final plat approval without being subject to the <br />moratorium. <br />Any ordinance establishing a development moratorium must expressly include at the time of <br />adoption each of the following: <br />(1) A clear statement of the problems or conditions necessitating the moratorium and what <br />courses of action, alternative to a moratorium, were considered by the county and <br />why those alternative courses of action were not deemed adequate. <br />(2) A clear statement of the development approvals subject to the moratorium and how a <br />moratorium on those approvals will address the problems or conditions leading to <br />imposition of the moratorium. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.