Minutes - 20080610 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

unemployment, but it doesn't have adequate em . We have people working full-time who are on food stamps. So I would suggest that that would be a good place to have that as a key issue. On page 3-10, I found this a little confusing. We talk about the counties in the Research Triangle Region. Is Alamance County in the Research Triangle Region? I don't think Alamance and Person County are in the Research Triangle Region. We ought to say who we are comparing ourselves to and be more explicit than just saying "region," This comes up later with use-value because we say we're 41%, and we don't' compare ourselves to other counties because we're the highest in the region for use-value. So, it gives a little better sense of perspective. Commissioner Gordon: I think it would be worth trying to follow up on that. what is the Research Triangle Region? Certainly, originally it was Durham, Orange, and Wake. And if you look at how the legislature is defining in the transportation bill, they say Durham, Orange, and Wake. And the Triangle is the three m jor Universities—Chapel with UNC, Durham with Duke, and N. C. State with Raleigh. That's what the Research Triangle is, and then there's a Research Triangle Park in the middle. I don't think there's any doubt that it's those three counties. If you want to then say Research Triangle Region, and adjacent because the legislature does that also, and what they allow those counties that are adjacent, if they're over a certain population, then they're allowed to do something else. Chair Jacobs: If we're just saying Research Triangle F{egion, and we're the |oxveet, then we're number 3, if that's how we define it as Wake, Durham, and Orange. We should say what it is. Commissioner Carey: It depends on what our objective is. I think when we're always talking about Research Triangle F`mrk, that's three cnUDties, but if we don't-include Chatham in the region, it's a relentless experience. Chair Jacobs: Then maybe we want to say "In the Region" and leave out Research Triangle, because the chart below it has Alamance, Chatham, and Person, which are not in the Research Triangle Region, but they are our neighbors. Commissioner Carey: They're our neighbors, and if we're talking about economic development terms, they are people that we are competing with for jobs, but they are not in the Research Triangle Region. So what are we asking our staff to do here? Chair Jacobs: I would ask them to take out"Research Triangle" and just say "neighboring counties." Commissioner Carey: I think I agree, and then the very next chart, although it's talking about agricultural comparisons, it has a different rubric as well. It doesn't have Person. Chair Jacobs: I would suggest that for use value that we compare it also. We have a lot of smart landowners, but it also affects our tax base. Commissioner Gordon: Following up on what you said and what to include, on page 3-13, Average Weekly Wages Comparison, it doesn't have Person County. So maybe the question is what's the reason for the counties that are included? Is there some reason that's not available? Chair Jacobs: We asked Tom Altieri to include these counties to keep the charts consistent.