Minutes - 20080610 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Laura Blackmon: I think the Comprehensive Plan is all the things you have mentioned and as we go through each year with the goals and initiatives, and establishing tasks that we can budget from, we would be pulling things from the plan and making decisions on what we're going to fund and provide both the staffing and the funds to do this. Chapter 2: Planning Principles Commissioner Gordon: Number 3 is really two goals. Chair Jacobs: It's certainly verbose. Commissioner Gordon: It was, "Promote both air quality and protection of the development of an effective transportation system," and then we decided that we really ought to encourage energy efficiency, lower energy consumption, and the use of non-polluting and renewable energy resources. We just put it all on that one. I just want to flag it, because I don't really want to open up that we go through and start redoing our goals. The reason that I think about it right now is that I notice that later on there is one element that deals with air quality protection and the development of the transportation system, and I don't even think that it gets at air quality protection. It is not highlighted enough. Certainly, in this day of global climate change and all of the things that we have in terms of energy crisis, certainly encouraging energy efficiency, etc., is important, but also so is promoting air-quality protection and development of an effective transportation system. I think it's so global that I think that, maybe it's not sharpened up enough because it was such a huge goal. I'm not saying change content or anything, but I think that "while" should be deleted and then have another goal after"while." Chair Jacobs: I agree that it's too much but since the Commissioner that suggested that wording is not here, I think we should wait. Commissioners Gordon and Carey agreed. I would also point out that the bottom of the page on the CD says, "Public Hearing Draft 3-5-08" and this says, "Public Hearing Draft 5-6-08." So we may have distributed a two-month old version. Chapter 3: Economic Development Element Chair Jacobs: Since we're doing a background of Orange County's history as an economic entity, I think it's worth mentioning that when Alamance County was created in 1849 and I am guessing Durham County in 1871, those were the parts that had a lot of industry. So, if we're doing a history of Orange County and we're saying, based on the University and agriculture, part of that was because they took with them the vast majority of the manufacturing base of the County. That is not insignificant. Some of this goes all the way back to the Occaneechi Indians. Then in this last paragraph, "Strategic economic development efforts,"there is almost nothing in this whole element about either promoting small business or encouraging existing business. I know it's part of the strategic plan, but there is virtually no mention. So, I think in that last paragraph on page 3-1 is a good place to start. On page 3-6 under Key Issues, it says, "Previous economic development efforts and studies have honed," maybe check the dictionary to make sure this is the correct word. Under these Key Issues, I would suggest, another theme that is not in here at all, that says, "providing improved opportunities for the under-employed and extended opportunities for an aging workforce." It's a big thrust in the Master Aging Plan to provide opportunities for seniors to continue to work. And one of the reasons we wanted the Durham Technical Community College is because we have a lot of under-employed people. We keep talking about low