Orange County NC Website
our regulations into a text, and then in some cases not followed through with any zoning <br /> changes, and in some cases followed through with zoning changes. <br /> Commissioner Carey: I want to give you the wordsmith for 5-25, and the discussion about <br /> demographics. The sentence that says, "It should be noted that minority populations are often <br /> undercounted during Census periods," is true. That's okay. But the next one says, "If this is <br /> true." I think that ought to be stated more in the affirrnmtive, such as "Since this was the case in <br /> the 2000 Census." <br /> Chair Jacobs: On 5-30, we had this discussion about the poverty rate once before. I don't <br /> remember the answer. I think the answer was this does include students at UNC, and if it does, <br /> it's not an accurate number. <br /> Commissioner Gordon: They may not have the data without students, but you could find out <br /> whether it included students. <br /> Laura Blackmon: I think the census data does include students. <br /> Chair Jacobs: Then let's just say that. I don't want to presume that it does, but if it does and <br /> you can't separate them out, then we should indicate it. In a county where 1/5 of the population <br /> is college students, it's not an insignificant number. <br /> Craig Benedict: A national study that had the most disparate income levels between the <br /> students and the high-income put Orange County as one of the top four in the nation because of <br /> the students, and then an area just north of near Whitfield Road showed it really high. <br /> Chair Jacobs: On page 5-32, line 4, I think it should say, "There are, however, positive signs of <br /> community and private commitments to land and watershed preservation." It's not just the <br /> government. Private people actually do protect land. ADdunderT[aDSpDrt@tiVnTrendo. it says, <br /> "In 2004, Orange County was declared a 'non-attainment' area." It was part of a non-attainment <br /> area, was it not? <br /> Commissioner Gordon: Also, for some it is now a maintenance area. Just for the <br /> transportation trends, there is some brand new data coming from the Durham-Chapel Hill- <br /> C|arrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization, and this could be updated. There is just a lot of <br /> information that's been gathered. Karen Lincoln knows where that is. /\ctua||y, all of the <br /> information might not be complete until the end of June or beginning of July, but the Long- <br /> Range Transportation Plan for 2035 has a lot of data, and I actually think the data you need is <br /> probably done. Anyway, if you look in the meeting for tomorrow, the Long-Range <br /> Transportation Plan, Item 10, in the agenda abstract you can see there's a table that tells you <br /> what's included and that Item 10 tells a lot of information that's available now. <br /> Chair Jacobs: Page 5-35, the bullets starting on line 19, the County doesn't need to develop <br /> policies to encourage green building practices because we already have them. The County <br /> may need to build upon policies to encourage green building practices. We already have them <br /> as part of the Environmental Responsibility Goal. And then I would just add, "creating <br /> incentives for private developers to use more environmentally friendly construction and <br /> demolition techniques." Because we did talk about deconstruction, and I noted a number of <br /> places where it fits. <br />