Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - 7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - 7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 12:24:46 PM
Creation date
5/6/2013 12:00:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/7/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-07-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
RES-2013-041 Resolution Establishing the Year for the Next General Reappraisal
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />immaterial. Similarly, the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) recommends <br />the following standards of accuracy for data collection: <br />• Continuous or area measurement data, such as living area and exterior wall height, should <br />be accurate within one foot (rounded to the nearest foot) of the true dimensions or within <br />5% of the area. If areas, dimensions, or volumes must be estimated, the property records <br />should note where quantities are estimated. <br />• For each objective, categorical or binary data field to be collected or verified, at least 95 <br />percent of the coded entries should be accurate. <br />• For each subjective categorical data field collected or verified, data should be coded <br />correctly at least 90 percent of the time. Subjective categorical data characteristics <br />include data items such as quality grade, physical condition, and architectural style. <br />It seems that both the NC Real Estate Commission and IAAO adhere to similar standards. Both <br />recognize the imperfections that may occur when measuring a property, judging its quality of <br />construction, or forming an opinion of value. In local government, the General Assembly has <br />placed significant burden on the taxpayer to appeal any inaccuracies or valuation concerns each <br />year during the appeals process. This process allows a local government's tax base to be <br />finalized without jeopardizing budgeted revenue and fiscal standing. <br />Recommendation <br />Market statistics show Orange County real estate markets to be improving. While we notice <br />manifestations of properties selling for more or less than tax assessment, those will occur in any <br />market in any year. The majority of current qualified market sales hover around current tax <br />assessments. Furthermore, the economy is improving with more market activity, shorter selling <br />times and higher selling prices. Should Orange County move forward with a 2015 revaluation, it <br />likely will occur at a time when tax assessments and market values are in unison already. The <br />sales ratio has been gradually declining indicating that market values are rising. <br />Based on this analysis, it is recommended the Orange County delay its scheduled January 1, <br />2015 countywide property tax revaluation until January 1, 2017. This is legally permissible as it <br />remains within the eight -year statutory mandate. As the economy continues to improve, <br />performing a countywide revaluation effective January 1, 2015 may result in no change in value <br />for avast majority of properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.