Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 2:06:28 PM
Creation date
5/6/2013 11:52:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/7/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-07-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
ORD-2013-016 Ordinance approving UDO Text Amendments – Modification of Site Plan Submittal Requirements
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />The State recently implemented stormwater management and nutrient reduction <br />strategies. As part of these strategies, the County recently modified existing regulations <br />mandating the preparation and submittal of formal, engineered, stormwater management <br />plans as part of any development project where proposed land disturbance reached the <br />following thresholds- <br />Watershed/River Basin <br />Stormwater — Non- <br />Stormwater — Residential <br />residential <br />Cape Fear (includes the <br />Projects proposing over <br />Projects proposing over <br />Back Creek, Haw River, <br />21,780 square feet of <br />43,560 square feet of <br />Cane Creek, Jordan Lake, <br />disturbance are required <br />disturbance are required to <br />and University Lake <br />to submit a stormwater <br />submit a stormwater <br />protected and critical <br />management plan. <br />management plan. <br />watershed overlay districts as <br />well as those properties <br />within the basin not located in <br />a watershed overlay district). <br />Neuse (includes Flat River, <br />Projects proposing over <br />Projects proposing over <br />Little River, Upper and Lower <br />12,000 square feet of <br />21,780 square feet of <br />Eno protected and critical <br />disturbance are required <br />disturbance are required to <br />watershed overlay districts as <br />to submit a stormwater <br />submit a stormwater <br />well as those properties <br />management plan. <br />management plan. <br />within the basin not located in <br />a watershed overlay district). <br />Roanoke (includes South <br />Projects proposing over <br />Projects proposing over <br />Hyco Creek protected <br />20,000 square feet of <br />43,560 square feet of <br />watershed overlay district). <br />disturbance are required <br />disturbance are required to <br />to submit a stormwater <br />submit a stormwater <br />management plan. <br />management plan. <br />These changes were incorporated into the UDO on April 17, 2012. The agenda packet <br />for this meeting can be found utilizing the following <br />link: http:// orangecountync .gov /OCCLERKS /120417.htm <br />Currently there are conflicting requirements within the UDO detailing when a formal, <br />professionally prepared, site plan is required. <br />For example Section 2.4.1 requires a professionally prepared site plan for single - family <br />developments on property located within the University Lake Protected and Critical <br />Watershed Overlay Districts. Section 2.5.2, the section of the UDO addressing site plan <br />application requirements, specifically exempt single - family development projects from <br />submitting a professionally prepared site plan. <br />Problems also arise in those instances where a project's proposed overall land <br />disturbance requires submission of a formal stormwater management plan. Staff does <br />not want there to be conflicting information provided to the public as to when a formal site <br />plan is required nor do we want the staff of Current Planning and Erosion Control to <br />potentially be looking at 2 different sets of plans proposing the development of a given <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.