Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-07-2013 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 2:06:28 PM
Creation date
5/6/2013 11:52:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/7/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-07-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
ORD-2013-016 Ordinance approving UDO Text Amendments – Modification of Site Plan Submittal Requirements
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 <br />DRAFT <br />103 occasions in Orange County even in the less protected watersheds. From our standpoint this is a reasonable <br />104 compromise, it provides the link we were looking for in terms of referring people to the stormwater thresholds. We <br />105 are asking the Board to complete its review, you have OWASA's statement and the ordinance amendment has <br />106 been rewritten to incorporate option c as suggested by the Board. <br />107 <br />108 <br />109 Maxecine Mitchell: So you're saying that the cutting of trees is part of the impervious surface? <br />110 <br />111 Michael Harvey: That would be part of land disturbance, as we discussed at the quarterly public hearing when <br />112 Commissioner Dorosin asked the same question but the simple act of cutting a tree does not mean you are adding <br />113 impervious surface area to your property. Once you built a house, you build a driveway (gravel), these actions <br />114 represent the placement of impervious surface area on your property which for the majority of the County is limited <br />115 based on your location within a Watershed Protection Overlay District. Say you have a wooded area and you clear <br />116 that for your septic field, you clear additional area for view shed, to support the development of your house, that is <br />117 land disturbance activities. What this ordinance amendment does is make reference to existing standards that if <br />118 you exceed this level of land disturbance, you have to do the formal stormwater plan and we will require the site <br />119 specific development plan with it. <br />120 <br />121 Pete Hallenbeck: So what we're looking at here is these disturbance limits that we're reviewing on page 18 is that <br />122 disturbance defined as both the impervious surface and ground that you tear up for some reason. <br />123 <br />124 Herman Staats: So that I understand, cutting timber is not land disturbance if you don't dig up the roots or bulldoze? <br />125 <br />126 Michael Harvey: Cutting timber can be in certain circumstances, as defined by erosion control, can be land <br />127 disturbance. There are situations where it is exempt because it is either a bona fide farm or if you're not disturbing <br />128 the ground cover. In theory yes, that is true but once you disturb the ground cover then it becomes land <br />129 disturbance. <br />130 <br />131 Pete Hallenbeck: Commissioner McKee was curious how this would impact someone who wanted to build a house <br />132 for parents or children on their land and I've had some emails and worked through some examples. My take is that <br />133 there is no simple way to sum up the impact of this and say as long as it's only this size house, you're good <br />134 because the process requires all these different aspects. What does house disturbance footprint, which is going to <br />135 be an impervious surface plus some area of around it, the driveway footprint, the septic tank, other areas. Also <br />136 having gone through the process of having built a house in the county, there is a bunch of stuff going on, and my <br />137 experience was that the sooner you engage the planning department with what you're doing the better because <br />138 they can walk you through the rules and this is all part of the process of designing what you're doing. I think the <br />139 best you can do to explain it to people is just make them aware of this process. <br />140 <br />141 Herman Staats: I remember Commissioner McKee was asking about what someone could do if they got a piece of <br />142 land, the recommendation that we're making is based on the state law, is that right? <br />143 <br />144 Michael Harvey: The recommendation you're making is, instead of having the existing standard which says <br />145 everybody in University Lake has to give you a professionally prepared site plan no matter what, we are basically <br />146 linking the submission of that site plan to the stormwater land disturbance thresholds we adopted last year. That to <br />147 us is a universal standard. No matter what we do this is here. It's our position, and you have agreed with it, there's <br />148 no need to have multiple caveats in the code which is what we have now. <br />149 <br />150 Tony Blake: The County always has the sufficient cause to ask for one (site plan). <br />151 <br />152 Michael Harvey: Yes, we do what is called a site assessment now for every project typically before they even apply <br />153 for a building permit. Site assessment is designed to identify all environmental factors and issues on any given <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.