Orange County NC Website
that it is rated "impaired" by the Division of Water Quality. For this reason, the Falls Lake <br /> Nutrient Management Strategy, or Falls Lake Rules, was adopted in 2010. <br /> Referring to slide 2, he said that the impairment of the lake is caused by too many <br /> nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) in the lake. Nutrient sources include: storm water from <br /> development, agricultural runoff, wastewater treatment plants, DOT property runoff, state and <br /> federal property runoff, forested land runoff, as well as atmospheric deposition of nitrogen. <br /> He said that the goal of the rules is to restore water quality throughout the lake and he <br /> noted that DWQ modeling indicates significant reductions in nutrient runoff are needed to <br /> restore the lake. Warmer colors on the map on slide 2 indicate greater impairment in the <br /> Upper Lake than in the Lower Lake. <br /> He said that it is anticipated to be very expensive to comply with rules as they are <br /> currently written, and it is estimated that the cost will be greater than 1.5 billion dollars. <br /> Referring to slide 3, he said that given the projected cost, as well as uncertainties with <br /> the lake modeling completed by the Department of Water Quality (DWQ), the UNRBA has <br /> embarked on a process called The Path Forward. This process will re-examine Stage II of the <br /> Falls Lake Rules while preserving the lake as a water supply for the City of Raleigh. He said <br /> Stage II of the rules will be in effect from 2021 to 2036 and Stage I is in effect currently. He <br /> said the Path Forward Process was conceived shortly after the Falls Lake Rules were finalized, <br /> and the Process is outlined in the document titled The Consensus Principles, which is included <br /> in the materials provided to the Board. <br /> He said that the UNRBA hired a consultant in 2011 to initiate the Path Forward <br /> process. He said this consultant has completed the 4 tasks outlined on slide 4 to provide <br /> information and direction to the process of re-examining Stage 11 of the rules. The collection of <br /> more data will mean fewer assumptions in the re-examination of the Lake. He said the rules <br /> stipulate that 3 years of data must be submitted by 2020 to be considered in the re- <br /> examination of the Lake. <br /> He said that UNRBA plans to begin monitoring in 2014, and dues and fees must be <br /> increased to cover the cost of this work. He referenced the outline of these fees, shown in the <br /> chart on slide 6, and noted that Orange County's share is $68,321. He said that $500,000 is <br /> designated for Lake and Watershed monitoring and related activities during the next fiscal <br /> year. <br /> He reviewed the expected achievements of the Path Forward Process, as outlined on <br /> slide 7. He noted that The Consensus Principles, adopted by the BOCC in 2010, included the <br /> following: "The affected local governments should share resources and assist with funding for <br /> the examination of the Nutrient Management Strategy." <br /> Commissioner Pelissier made reference to stage 2 in the packet, and she asked for <br /> examples of some of the current best practices in use now. <br /> Tom Davis said there are more BMPs in the urban areas than rural areas. He said the <br /> process is to get DWQ to grant credits for certain BMPs, but this has not been done yet. He <br /> gave the example of street sweeping in urban areas, and said there has been no credit <br /> established for this. He said that one other urban project underway is the Efland Sewer <br /> System, but there has been no credit established for switching a home from septic to sewer. <br /> He said there are also a couple of projects underway in the rural areas and a long list of <br /> potential agricultural BMPs. <br /> Gail Hughes said that some of the examples for agricultural communities are: fencing, <br /> livestock out of streams, additional buffer widths, and conservation tillage. She said that for <br /> agricultural farms with no livestock, the buffers must be expanded much wider and this takes <br /> up useable agricultural land. This is of great concern to the farmer or land owner. She said <br /> that some things that urban areas get credit for, such as grass swells, exist in agricultural <br /> communities as well, but are not credited. <br />