Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-23-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 04-23-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-23-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2013 2:34:08 PM
Creation date
4/19/2013 2:33:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/16/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-23-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee clarified that he is not criticizing any county actions. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Commissioner Dorosin said the Board needs to re-visit the policy of this model with high <br /> 4 end condo units and the sustainability issues that come with requiring unit set-asides. He said <br /> 5 that integrated housing is desired, but issues like this and problems with homeowner <br /> 6 association dues can outweigh the different price point units. He said there should be more <br /> 7 control over how the units are designed and function in the future. He said the Board needs to <br /> 8 really look at how it is using financial and political resources. <br /> 9 Commissioner Rich said this discussion always occurs when development projects <br /> 10 come forward. She said that the affordable housing program always wants units, but a plan <br /> 11 needs to be made that considers a balance of the issues. <br /> 12 Commissioner Dorosin said the lesson learned with Abby Court is that the homeowners <br /> 13 associations are controlled by the majority of the unit holders; and the majority is not the <br /> 14 affordable housing residents. This means that those low income residents are at the mercy of <br /> 15 the association. <br /> 16 Chair Jacobs said Orange County government does not require any condo units; that is <br /> 17 done by the towns. He said Robert Dowling did ask the towns to re-visit this issue. He said <br /> 18 unless they engage the municipalities in this discussion, affordable housing in the southern part <br /> 19 of the county is not under the Board's purview. He said perhaps promotion of high density <br /> 20 housing is desired so that affordable units are possible; however this means the Board needs to <br /> 21 have its own policy. He said that, with this building, he would like to see if there are any other <br /> 22 systems like this that will become an issue a year from now. <br /> 23 Commissioner Rich said the Bosch washers and dryers are the same situation. <br /> 24 Chair Jacobs asked if anyone has done a comparative analysis of the pitfalls of these <br /> 25 units, <br /> 26 Robert Dowling said an analysis has not been done. He said there has been a transfer <br /> 27 fee tax implemented that will support affordable units, and as units sell, these fees will help. He <br /> 28 said that there will be special assessments and there is money for some of these unknowns, but <br /> 29 there is not enough money to pay for the HVAC units. <br /> 30 Commissioner Price clarified that if the Board goes along with this request, the money <br /> 31 will pay for new units, not repairs. <br /> 32 Robert Dowling said CHT could handle the small repairs. <br /> 33 Katherine Doom said AHAB did ask extensive questions during their tour of <br /> 34 Greenbridge. She said that there are no good answers here. She said AHAB spoke with <br /> 35 owners of units and saw both a low end and a high end unit. She acknowledged that there is <br /> 36 not a good way to resolve this issue. <br /> 37 Tara Fikes said the recommendation of AHAB is for these funds to be set aside for the <br /> 38 requested services. She has talked with the Orange County Finance Director, who said it is <br /> 39 okay to move forward. She said the recommendation is for approval of the requested funds. <br /> 40 Katherine Doom said there was no way to avoid hurting the homeowners if the funds are <br /> 41 not approved. <br /> 42 Commissioner McKee said Robert Dowling mentioned another style that could possibly <br /> 43 be put in the units. He requested that Robert Dowling let the Board know the answer as to <br /> 44 whether this could be done. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 - HOME Program — Live/Work and First-time Homebuyer Requirements <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Tara Fikes said the second letter in front of the Commissioners came from CHT and <br /> 49 highlights the difficulties CHT is having in selling homes. She said the request is for the HOME <br /> 50 review committee to be relieved of the Live/Work clause (having to work and live in Orange <br /> 51 County). She said the request is that if a buyer cannot be found in Orange County within 90 <br /> 52 days, CHT would like to look outside of Orange County to broaden the pool of purchases. She <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.