Agenda - 04-23-2013 - 5a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

14 1 Joe Clayton said prior to coming under Orange County's control, these programs were 2 run poorly. He is now a solid waste economist and he said everyone needs to be included in 3 the program and everyone should benefit. He said the County should be completely honest and 4 open. 5 Jessica Bolllinger said she has an Efland Trash service and she started this business. 6 Her business is specifically set up to handle long, narrow driveways that trucks cannot handle. 7 She said she believes her business will suffer if Orange County franchises solid waste. 8 Jan Sassaman was speaking as a resident of Chapel Hill and not as a member of the 9 Solid Waste Advisory Board. He said he appreciated that this is a process but he feels a sense 10 of urgency with this process. He said the recycling program of Orange County is doing fine. 11 He said a subscription based program would create a disincentive to recycle. He asked staff to 12 identify the specific issues they are trying to resolve. He said this proposal is counter to the 13 long-range solid waste plan adopted by the County Commissioners. 14 Tom Linden said he has not heard any compelling reasons to go to a franchise system 15 and he is afraid they will be going with an "opt in" system which may reduce recycling in Orange 16 County. 17 Jim Ward from Chapel Hill Town Council said in his opinion this recommendation 18 represents a precipitous decision that begins to sabotage the County's program. He said the 19 information he has seen has come out of the Manager's office. He does not understand why 20 the County would want to dismantle the recycling program. He fears that the premiere recycling 21 program would cease to exist. He would like the Board to discuss the other options in a public 22 forum. 23 Commissioner Rich said she would like to digest the public's comments before the 24 Board moves forward. 25 Chair Jacobs said the next step was to schedule a public hearing on April 23 d at the 26 Southern Human Services Center and whether to pursue a franchise agreement process. 27 Commissioner Rich said she is hearing that maybe there may be more discussion that 28 needs to take place before considering a franchise. 29 Commissioner Price said the public has asked for pros and cons and how to do this and 30 that there should be a public hearing. She asked if this was possible in advance of the public 31 hearing. She said she felt uneasy with moving forward with just one option. The Board needs 32 to explore other alternatives. 33 Chair Jacobs asked Frank Clifton if it is reasonable to have a more detailed discussion 34 at one of the future meetings. 35 Frank Clifton said the process is laid out like it is because it is a laborious process that 36 must be followed. 37 Commissioner Price said with the timeline it assumes that the Board wants this option 38 alone. 39 Frank Clifton said the staff has not made any decisions yet. The Board still can decide 40 on any of the options. At any point there can be more meetings and more public input. 41 Chair Jacobs said there is time before April 23 d to have a full discussion on the pros 42 and cons and that could precede the public hearing. 43 Commissioner McKee agreed with Chair Jacobs and said that would be a path to follow 44 - to hold the April 23 d public hearing but have this item on another regular meeting or work 45 session to discuss this further. 46 Commissioner Gordon asked when the other meeting would be held. She said the 47 public hearing does set the Board on this path. 48 Frank Clifton said there is a timeframe by state statute to send out notices to existing 49 vendors and this would need to go out by March 15th. This is the deadline for everyone to be 50 notified.