Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2000 - C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 02-28-2000
>
Agenda - 02-28-2000 - C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2013 4:36:01 PM
Creation date
4/16/2013 4:35:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2000
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 02-28-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
ORD-2000-006 Amendments to the Orange County Zoning Ordinance Section
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2000
ORD-2000-007 Amendments to the Orange County Subdivision Regulations Section II Definitions
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO BE DELETED AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED <br /> SECTION 2.6 TRANSPORTATION 12Z <br /> COUNTY-SPECIFIC ROAD CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM <br /> Policy issues <br /> Roads can be classified by the function they serve in the total road <br /> network. This classification, takes into consideration the existing <br /> conditions as well as the planned future function. Some roads are <br /> more important in terms .of carrying major traffic volumes or in <br /> making connections between major destinations, while other roads have <br /> a primary value in providing access to adjacent property. . In <br /> general, there is an inverse relationship between the traffic- <br /> ca=rying function and the land-access function; i.e. , a four-lane <br /> road's primary function would be to move traffic, while the function <br /> of a two-lane road in a subdivision would be to serve the abutting <br /> land with frequent driveways. The extreme for each case would be an <br /> Interstate freeway for the function of moving traffic and a short, <br /> narrow, residential cul-de-sac for the function of land access. With <br /> the exception of an Interstate freeway, all roads provide each <br /> function to varying degrees. <br /> Data Collection <br /> There are certain roadway characteristics that are related to a <br /> properly designed and classified road. To aid in developing the <br /> functional classification for Orange County, the following roadway <br /> characteristics were inventoried for every public road in the County, <br /> outside of the urbanized planning boundaries: length, type of <br /> surface, number of lanes, road width, shoulder width, right-of-way <br /> width, type of adjacent land use, extent of development, speed limit, <br /> traffic control, roadway alignment, and traffic volumes . This <br /> inventory was collected by the County and, if maintained, will <br /> provide a thorough and accurate data base for further planning and <br /> programming. <br /> To assist in data collection, analysis, and classification of the <br /> road network, Orange County contracted with the consulting firm of <br /> Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. of Raleigh, N.C. Kimley-Horn <br /> obtained mapping of public roads within the county and NCDOT roadway <br /> inventory printouts, .developed a spreadsheet format for recording the <br /> data, and conducted a data collection training program with members <br /> of .the Comprehensive Division of the Orange County Planning <br /> Department. Comprehensive Planning staff input the data from the <br /> maps and printouts, as well as data observed and checked in the <br /> field. This data file originally included only that portion of the <br /> county outside of urban thoroughfare planning boundaries, i.e. , the <br /> study areas for Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro, Hillsborough, and <br /> Mebane/Alamance County. The data file was later expanded to include <br /> the area within the Hillsborough study area but outside the city's <br /> extraterritorial planning jurisdiction (ETJ) . <br /> 2 .6-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.