Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-28-2000 - C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Agenda - 02-28-2000
>
Agenda - 02-28-2000 - C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2013 4:36:01 PM
Creation date
4/16/2013 4:35:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/28/2000
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 02-28-2000
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2000
ORD-2000-006 Amendments to the Orange County Zoning Ordinance Section
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2000
ORD-2000-007 Amendments to the Orange County Subdivision Regulations Section II Definitions
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO BE DELETED AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED <br /> SECTION 2.6 TRANSPORTATION .27 <br /> Recommended Classifications <br /> r , <br /> The 'criteria described in Table Z were then applied to the street <br /> network in the rural Orange County study area. The recommended <br /> classifications for the road system are shown in Figure land <br /> summarized in Table 2. <br /> Comparison With Urban Study Area Classifications <br /> ,Where roads cross planning boundaries, the road classifications <br /> *ere compared with those determined by NCDOT for the Hillsborough and <br /> Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro (D-CH-C) transportation planning areas <br /> (see Table 3) . It would generally be expected that roads classified <br /> as principal arterials, minor arterials, or collectors in the county <br /> study area would correspond to freeways or major thoroughfares in the <br /> urban study areas, while the county major or minor local streets <br /> would not be classified as thoroughfares. (Minor thoroughfares are <br /> not common and are determined on almost a case-by-case basis. ) <br /> } <br /> i <br /> 4 <br /> F ' <br /> M <br /> 4 <br /> 2.6-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.