Orange County NC Website
2 <br /> Existing and Proposed Conditions (cont.) <br /> Existing: Appendix A. Private Road Standards <br /> • 1 to 3 lots or du allowed on a Class C Private Road (8 ft. travelway). <br /> • 4 to 9 lots or du allowed on a Class B Private Road (12 ft. travelway). <br /> • 10 to 25 lots or du allowed on a Class A Private Road (18 ft. travelway). <br /> • > 25 lots allowed on private road if road is built to NCDOT standards. <br /> • Professional engineer or surveyor certification of road construction. <br /> Proposed: Section N-B 3-d—1 <br /> • Criterion 1.a (increased lot size) and at least two other criteria must be met to justify a <br /> private road; no private road justification needed for minor subdivisions of 3 lots or less; <br /> • minimum lot size: <br /> zoning district min. lot size for <br /> min. lot size private road <br /> 40,000 s . ft. or less 80,000 s . ft. <br /> 87,120 s . ft. 2 ac. 130,680 s .ft. 3 ac. <br /> 87,120 s . ft. —flexible development 87,120 s . ft. 2 acres <br /> All other cases 1 5 acres <br /> • building setbacks (all districts) at least twice those required by Zoning Ordinance. <br /> • 50% dedication of land if containing sites referenced in "An Inventory of Sites of Cultural. <br /> Historic, Recreational,_ Biological, and Geological Significance in the Unincorporated <br /> Portions of Orange County", <br /> • within protected watersheds: <br /> stream buffers increased 25%. <br /> Impervious surface decreased by 15%. <br /> Proposed: Appendix A. Private Road Standards <br /> • Class B Private Road (12 ft. travelway) required for 1 to 5 lots (Minor Subdivisions) or <br /> dwelling units. <br /> • Class A Private Road (18 ft. travelway) required for 6- to 10-lot Major Subdivisions (or <br /> dwelling units). <br /> • No exception for>10 lots on private road. <br /> • Professional engineer certification of road construction. <br /> Implications <br /> Pros: . Long-term reduced maintenance costs for citizens; <br /> • Better planning for long-term development of property (discourages "piece-meal" <br /> development); <br /> • Investment in better infrastructure for future subdivision; <br /> • Better response time for emergency access. <br /> Cons: . Minor increases in costs for minor subdivision development; <br /> Development Process Schedule and Action <br /> • Public Hearing February 28, 2000: Major comments: <br /> o No flexibility for private roads to protect natural resources or rural character; and <br /> o Cost of private road certification will increase for small subdividers. <br /> The Board of County Commissioners referred the proposed amendments to the Planning Board <br /> to return a recommendation no sooner than May 3, 2000. <br />