Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
16 <br /> 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 MAY 4,2000 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Allison(Chair), Rachel Preston,Bob Strayhorn, Crauford <br /> 7 Goodwin,Karen Barrows, Howard McAdams, James Selkirk, <br /> 8 Nicole Gooding-Ray <br /> 9 <br /> to MEMBERS ABSENT: Runyon Woods,Barry Katz, Lynne Holtkamp, Onie Lee - all <br /> 11 excused <br /> 12 <br /> 13 STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Craig Benedict,Planners Robert Davis, Eddie <br /> 14 Kirk, and Jane Garrett,Tina Moon, and Administrative Assistant <br /> 15 Joanna Bradshaw <br /> 16 <br /> 17 AGENDA ITEM#1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL <br /> 18 Chair Allison called the meeting to order. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 AGENDA ITEM#2: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA <br /> 21 None. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 AGENDA ITEM#3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES -April 5, 2000 <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Barrows said that Lynne Holtkamp was absent from this meeting. The minutes indicated that she <br /> 26 was present. The correction was made. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Barrows clarified what she was trying to say on page 12, line 44 noting that she was asking who <br /> 29 the developers would go to if they wanted to contest the ruling by staff. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 MOTION: Selkirk moved approval of the minutes for April 5, 2000 with the <br /> 32 corrections as stated above. Seconded by Strayhorn. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 (These corrections have been made.) <br /> 37 <br /> 38 .. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 AGENDA ITEM#9: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING(FEBRUARY 28, <br /> 41 2000) <br /> 42 ~ a. Orange County Private Road Standards <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Karen Lincoln made the presentation. She said that the purpose of this item was for the board to <br /> 45 make its recommendations to the County Commissioners regarding proposed amendments to the <br /> 46 Orange County Subdivision Regulations concerning private roads. The amendments were <br /> 47 presented at public hearing in February and forwarded to the board. The Planning Board <br /> 48 reviewed them at its April meeting and made several comments and requested revisions. These <br />