Browse
Search
Minutes 12-11-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 12-11-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2013 3:27:00 PM
Creation date
3/20/2013 9:21:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/11/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 5l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 6a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 6b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012 - 7c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-11a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-11b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-11c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-13 (3)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-13 (4)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 12-11-2012-13 (5)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 12-11-2012 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2012-059 Fiscal Year 2012-13 Budget Amendment #5
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
ORD-2012-060 Budget Amendment #5 related to CHCCS Capital Project Ordinance & Application for NC Education Lottery Proceeds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-108 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-109 Resolution approving Property Value Change resulting in Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-110 Resolution approving Property Tax Releases/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-111 Resolution approving Applications for Property Tax Exemption/Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-112 Resolution Levying the One Half Cent Public Transportation Tax for Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-113 Resolution Levying a Seven Dollar Vehicle Registration Tax on Motor Vehicles Registered in Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-114 Resolution Authorizing the Research Triangle Regional Public Transportation Authority to Levy the Full Eight Dollar Vehicle Registration Tax on Motor Vehicle Registered in Orange County
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
RES-2012-115 Resolution Urging the NC Div. of State Parks To Make Closing Mountains-to-Sea Trail Gaps Within the Eno River State Park One of its Highest Priorities
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MPO 2040 transportation plan that the TTA plan is based on. Our unanimous decision was <br /> based on many factors. Because of time constraints, I will share only some of them with you <br /> tonight. <br /> The Planning Board is encouraging the use of responsible data-based decision <br /> practices. In view of that, we have serious questions about the plan's population projections. <br /> Although a specific critical mass is needed to support transit, no data was presented proving <br /> that Chapel Hill could successfully absorb the quantity of housing and commercial building <br /> necessary for the type of transit proposed. A significant drawback to the plan is that it does not <br /> support many of the Future Focus areas established by the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. These <br /> areas, restricted to transit corridors, will most likely accommodate much of the projected growth <br /> for Chapel Hill. The small area plans that will be produced are expected to create density <br /> downtown, the length of MLK, Jr. Blvd, along 15-501 south and north near Ephesus Church <br /> Road. The Board believes that it is the Comprehensive Plan that should drive growth and <br /> development, and that a transit plan should be used to support that vision. We also noted the <br /> plan's shortcomings in serving the decentralizing hospital system, two Durham Tech <br /> Campuses and the county's two economic development zones. Light rail's very narrow area of <br /> impact provides the least flexibility in response to our changing growth patterns. <br /> It is the Planning Board's opinion that flexible, frequent and more extensive bus <br /> service, along with safe bike lanes and sidewalks, would better meet the needs of commuters <br /> and transit users, and at a lower cost per rider. The Planning Board is particularly concerned <br /> that the transit plan offers minimal improvement in travel times, which to us, is essential in <br /> order to encourage ridership and benefit the taxpayers who are funding it. Our consensus was <br /> that given the percentage of trips that will still occur by car, the low percentage of transit <br /> ridership, and the level of congestion remaining, we have not met the goals of a <br /> comprehensive transit plan, and will not achieve our transportation or environmental <br /> objectives. <br /> As you know, based partly on our input, the town council has created a new <br /> transportation workgroup —which could be an asset to the county if you opt to delay the tax <br /> and work to correct the deficiencies in the transit plan. You have my commitment to provide a <br /> rapid response on issues brought to the Chapel Hill planning board. <br /> The Planning Board will continue to encourage the Council to align transportation <br /> improvements with the future focus areas and to consider the dynamics of a more 21 st century <br /> plan by incorporating forward-looking demographics such as population aging, new home- <br /> workplace trends, on-line education opportunities, environmental protection and serving the <br /> broadest range of the County residents. <br /> You are making a pivotal decision that will impact all of the County for a long time. As <br /> the chair of the CH Planning Board, I know that we all want to make the most responsible and <br /> supportive decision for Orange County. Because the County will lose important negotiating <br /> leverage if you approve the tax tonight, I ask that you Ip ease consider a delay so that you can <br /> make sure that the transit plan is truly aligned to the priorities of the towns, the county and <br /> UNC. <br /> Linda Haac serves on Carrboro's Transportation Advisory Board. She said that she is <br /> speaking about the comments from her board on the 2040 Transportation Plan. She said that <br /> the plan needs to be fiscally constrained. She said that one thing that surprised her board was <br /> that the road miles did not change much with the inclusion of light rail. There was also great <br /> concern about the model used. It appeared to not explore different scenarios. She said that <br /> another board member expressed that transit investment should be paired with transportation <br /> demand management. There was also concern that the plan did not account for greenhouse <br /> emissions. She asked the Board to think about these things before making a decision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.