Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-19-2013 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2015 11:03:22 AM
Creation date
3/15/2013 9:42:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/19/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-19-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 1 Chair of Board of Elections Jim White said that most of their board is here and they are <br /> 2 enraged that they would consider moving the Board of Elections. He said there may be only <br /> 3 four employees but there were 12,000 voters in that building in November. He compared this to <br /> 4 the idea that the Commissioners' new meeting room is underutilized because there is no office <br /> 5 space in it. He said this is not a storage space but a voting space, and early voting site. He <br /> 6 said there are multiple uses for it and setting up cubicles there does not seem like a good use <br /> 7 for it. He expressed concern about voter parking and space in the plans and the need for <br /> 8 analysis of use studies before moving forward. <br /> 9 Chair Jacobs said there will be no decisions tonight and the point has been made that <br /> 10 more engagement needs to be made with the constituents, including the Board of Elections and <br /> 11 other cooperative extensions. <br /> 12 Commissioner Gordon said this underscores her point that unless you do the space <br /> 13 need studies she cannot make an informed decision. She said these decisions need to be <br /> 14 grounded in more data. She said it is helpful to have an analysis of the buildings; but there is no <br /> 15 data on departmental space requirements, usage, co-location, or chance for occupants to make <br /> 16 their case and these things are needed. <br /> 17 Chair Jacobs asked if it is more feasible to move folks from Revere Road to another <br /> 18 space better suited to their needs, rather than continuing to put money into that facility. He said <br /> 19 maybe the board should see the master plan for Blackwood Farm at New Hope because that <br /> 20 group envisioned an agriculture related park with demonstration plots and programming that <br /> 21 cannot be done at Revere Road, either. He said that, to Commissioner Gordon's point about <br /> 22 determining space needs and co-location questions, that might go far in determining whether to <br /> 23 continue investing in Revere Road; or recognize its limited life expectancy and put money aside <br /> 24 for a facility to be brought online at a future date when Revere will be for sale or deconstructed. <br /> 25 Frank Clifton said that of all the buildings the county owns, Revere Road is the biggest <br /> 26 liability. He said it's a great space for its use today but the roof is going to fail. He recommends <br /> 27 spending the barest amount possible on it if it is kept. He said the goal is to upgrade all county <br /> 28 facilities to a consistent level. He said the other discussion is to show properties that are, <br /> 29 through prior decisions of the board, now available and to determine best potential uses for <br /> 30 them. He said with Revere Road, they have simply made use of it. Farm Service Agency pays <br /> 31 rent in other counties, but the space here has been given to them in Orange County because it <br /> 32 was not being used for anything else. He said both interim and long term steps are being <br /> 33 looked at. It is a dilemma to consider spending money to replace air conditioning on a building <br /> 34 that's lifespan may only extend 2 more years. He noted that plans were designed for this <br /> 35 building two years ago and the decision was made not to move forward. <br /> 36 Chair Jacobs clarified that part of that decision was financial rather than design. <br /> 37 Commissioner Gordon said she did ask for an addition to the Link Government Services <br /> 38 Center and it could be made more high tech with better acoustics. She said does not know <br /> 39 what it will cost to add on this building, but she would like to put it on the table. <br /> 40 Frank Clifton said they have put geothermal wells, power, and air conditioning at the end <br /> 41 of the building and this was seen as a fairly extensive expense that would shut the building <br /> 42 down while those things were moved. <br /> 43 Commissioner Gordon said there was a lack of long term planning because those wells <br /> 44 were just put in and if a plan had been in place regarding a meeting room this wouldn't have <br /> 45 been done. She said she is getting more determined that a long term plan needs to be done. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Commissioner McKee said he does not believe any engagement was made with <br /> 48 services in the agri-building and their constituents. He said some of the wording in the abstract <br /> 49 regarding the deconstruction bothered him. He said this is a 50 year old building, the same age <br /> 50 as Orange High. He said he is aware of problems with the roof leaking in place but he <br /> 51 referenced the abstracts statement that the building has poor appearance and condition. He has <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.